Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021

This thesis examines the meaning and construction of the debated concept of hybrid war/warfare in the existing scholarly literature. The identified research problem stems from the lack of reflection on the conceptual reasoning and thought that underpins the nature of war, which relates to the fact t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lindberg, Filippa
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Försvarshögskolan 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-10271
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-fhs-10271
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-fhs-102712021-09-11T05:31:07ZHybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021engLindberg, FilippaFörsvarshögskolan2021Hybrid warHybrid warfareHybrid threatIrregular warAsymmetric warGray zone.Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)This thesis examines the meaning and construction of the debated concept of hybrid war/warfare in the existing scholarly literature. The identified research problem stems from the lack of reflection on the conceptual reasoning and thought that underpins the nature of war, which relates to the fact that a historical linguistic perspective is neglected in most studies on war. Through this study, conceptual history theory has demonstrated its utility in War Studies by illustrating the benefit of applying a historically focused lens on debated and contested concepts. Thus, demonstrating how both a synchronic and diachronic perspective is necessary to examine how the meaning and construction of a concept change over time.  The analysis aims to answer the question of how the meaning of the hybrid war concept has developed in the existing body of literature between 2008-2021. Based on the analysis, it was observed that the greatest shift in terms of the meaning and use of the concept occurred after the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014. The previously optimistic anticipation of hybrid war in future was replaced with a more critical understanding of the concept itself, and the prospect of its future. All in all, the result of this thesis, beside the observed shift in the meaning and construction of the hybrid war concept, is that conceptual history theory can contribute to the understanding of contested and debated concepts related to the nature of war.  Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-10271application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Hybrid war
Hybrid warfare
Hybrid threat
Irregular war
Asymmetric war
Gray zone.
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
spellingShingle Hybrid war
Hybrid warfare
Hybrid threat
Irregular war
Asymmetric war
Gray zone.
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Lindberg, Filippa
Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
description This thesis examines the meaning and construction of the debated concept of hybrid war/warfare in the existing scholarly literature. The identified research problem stems from the lack of reflection on the conceptual reasoning and thought that underpins the nature of war, which relates to the fact that a historical linguistic perspective is neglected in most studies on war. Through this study, conceptual history theory has demonstrated its utility in War Studies by illustrating the benefit of applying a historically focused lens on debated and contested concepts. Thus, demonstrating how both a synchronic and diachronic perspective is necessary to examine how the meaning and construction of a concept change over time.  The analysis aims to answer the question of how the meaning of the hybrid war concept has developed in the existing body of literature between 2008-2021. Based on the analysis, it was observed that the greatest shift in terms of the meaning and use of the concept occurred after the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014. The previously optimistic anticipation of hybrid war in future was replaced with a more critical understanding of the concept itself, and the prospect of its future. All in all, the result of this thesis, beside the observed shift in the meaning and construction of the hybrid war concept, is that conceptual history theory can contribute to the understanding of contested and debated concepts related to the nature of war. 
author Lindberg, Filippa
author_facet Lindberg, Filippa
author_sort Lindberg, Filippa
title Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
title_short Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
title_full Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
title_fullStr Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid War: A Conceptual History Study : The meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
title_sort hybrid war: a conceptual history study : the meaning of hybrid war in the scholarly debate between 2008-2021
publisher Försvarshögskolan
publishDate 2021
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-10271
work_keys_str_mv AT lindbergfilippa hybridwaraconceptualhistorystudythemeaningofhybridwarinthescholarlydebatebetween20082021
_version_ 1719480547576643584