A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language

This paper describes an experiment that compares the effectiveness of input-based activities and the effectiveness of meaning-focused output-based activities on L2 Chinese learners’ ability to comprehend and to produce the Chinese adverb “才 cai”. Input-based activities provide learners with the oppo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhang, Xiaolei
Format: Others
Published: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst 2013
Online Access:https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1097
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2176&context=theses
id ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-theses-2176
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-theses-21762020-12-02T14:43:42Z A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language Zhang, Xiaolei This paper describes an experiment that compares the effectiveness of input-based activities and the effectiveness of meaning-focused output-based activities on L2 Chinese learners’ ability to comprehend and to produce the Chinese adverb “才 cai”. Input-based activities provide learners with the opportunity to be exposed and work with the target language input. During input-based activities, learners are expected to turn the target language they read or hear into the linguistic data they understand. With the assistance of such input-based activities, L2 learners are likely to develop an implicit language system to internalize the target language and further acquire the language. Output-based activities provide L2 learners with the opportunity to produce the target language, in both writing and speaking. With the assistance of output-based activities, learners are able to find the gap between their language and the target language. During output-based activities, learners are also able to test their hypothesis, to reinforce positive evidence and revise negative evidence in their language. In the present study, participants (N=41) were assigned to three groups: input-based group (participants were engaged in input-based activities after the teacher’s lecture to practice the target form), output-based group (participants were engaged in output-based activities after the teacher’s lecture to practice the target form), and control group (participants were not engaged in any interactive activities after the teacher’s lecture). Participants’ performances were measured by reading comprehension, listening comprehension, writing production, and translation. A pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test were used to assess participants’ progresses. Results suggested that input-based activities and output-based activities led to similar amount of progress on participants’ comprehension. Meaning-focused output-based activities (activities that require learners to produce language output in a meaningful context with a communicative intent) led to greater gains than input-based activities on participants’ production. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1097 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2176&context=theses Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
description This paper describes an experiment that compares the effectiveness of input-based activities and the effectiveness of meaning-focused output-based activities on L2 Chinese learners’ ability to comprehend and to produce the Chinese adverb “才 cai”. Input-based activities provide learners with the opportunity to be exposed and work with the target language input. During input-based activities, learners are expected to turn the target language they read or hear into the linguistic data they understand. With the assistance of such input-based activities, L2 learners are likely to develop an implicit language system to internalize the target language and further acquire the language. Output-based activities provide L2 learners with the opportunity to produce the target language, in both writing and speaking. With the assistance of output-based activities, learners are able to find the gap between their language and the target language. During output-based activities, learners are also able to test their hypothesis, to reinforce positive evidence and revise negative evidence in their language. In the present study, participants (N=41) were assigned to three groups: input-based group (participants were engaged in input-based activities after the teacher’s lecture to practice the target form), output-based group (participants were engaged in output-based activities after the teacher’s lecture to practice the target form), and control group (participants were not engaged in any interactive activities after the teacher’s lecture). Participants’ performances were measured by reading comprehension, listening comprehension, writing production, and translation. A pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test were used to assess participants’ progresses. Results suggested that input-based activities and output-based activities led to similar amount of progress on participants’ comprehension. Meaning-focused output-based activities (activities that require learners to produce language output in a meaningful context with a communicative intent) led to greater gains than input-based activities on participants’ production.
author Zhang, Xiaolei
spellingShingle Zhang, Xiaolei
A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language
author_facet Zhang, Xiaolei
author_sort Zhang, Xiaolei
title A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language
title_short A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language
title_full A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Input-based Activities And Output-based Activities on the Acquisition of Chinese Language
title_sort comparative study of the effectiveness of input-based activities and output-based activities on the acquisition of chinese language
publisher ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
publishDate 2013
url https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1097
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2176&context=theses
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaolei acomparativestudyoftheeffectivenessofinputbasedactivitiesandoutputbasedactivitiesontheacquisitionofchineselanguage
AT zhangxiaolei comparativestudyoftheeffectivenessofinputbasedactivitiesandoutputbasedactivitiesontheacquisitionofchineselanguage
_version_ 1719366464877625344