Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice
Neoliberal ideology frames the discourse of the current political rhetoric of education as an economic investment in the preparation of students to compete in a global economy. These discourses that emanate from policymakers shape the construct of schooling and control the trajectory of education in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/750 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1755&context=open_access_dissertations |
id |
ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-open_access_dissertations-1755 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-open_access_dissertations-17552020-12-02T14:39:32Z Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice LaFrance, Denise LaVoie Neoliberal ideology frames the discourse of the current political rhetoric of education as an economic investment in the preparation of students to compete in a global economy. These discourses that emanate from policymakers shape the construct of schooling and control the trajectory of education in the US. As education policy becomes centralized, accountability systems are assumed to be the driver of positive educational outcomes and higher student achievement; however, the impact of these systems of accountability shape teaching practice and may be pushing students with disabilities out of the competition and violating their right to access and participate in general education. This study examined the outcomes of current educational policy on daily teaching practice and its impact on inclusive practice. In addition, it examined teachers' self-regulation as a means to adapt and remain in a regulated environment. The perspectives of beginning and experienced teachers from an urban and a rural area were analyzed through semi- structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. 2013-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/750 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1755&context=open_access_dissertations Open Access Dissertations ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Accountability educational policy Exclusion Governmentality Inclusion teacher preparation Education Teacher Education and Professional Development |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Accountability educational policy Exclusion Governmentality Inclusion teacher preparation Education Teacher Education and Professional Development |
spellingShingle |
Accountability educational policy Exclusion Governmentality Inclusion teacher preparation Education Teacher Education and Professional Development LaFrance, Denise LaVoie Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice |
description |
Neoliberal ideology frames the discourse of the current political rhetoric of education as an economic investment in the preparation of students to compete in a global economy. These discourses that emanate from policymakers shape the construct of schooling and control the trajectory of education in the US. As education policy becomes centralized, accountability systems are assumed to be the driver of positive educational outcomes and higher student achievement; however, the impact of these systems of accountability shape teaching practice and may be pushing students with disabilities out of the competition and violating their right to access and participate in general education. This study examined the outcomes of current educational policy on daily teaching practice and its impact on inclusive practice. In addition, it examined teachers' self-regulation as a means to adapt and remain in a regulated environment. The perspectives of beginning and experienced teachers from an urban and a rural area were analyzed through semi- structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. |
author |
LaFrance, Denise LaVoie |
author_facet |
LaFrance, Denise LaVoie |
author_sort |
LaFrance, Denise LaVoie |
title |
Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice |
title_short |
Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice |
title_full |
Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice |
title_fullStr |
Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systems of Accountability as a Technology of Governmentality: Policy, Preparation, and Inclusive Practice |
title_sort |
systems of accountability as a technology of governmentality: policy, preparation, and inclusive practice |
publisher |
ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/750 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1755&context=open_access_dissertations |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lafrancedeniselavoie systemsofaccountabilityasatechnologyofgovernmentalitypolicypreparationandinclusivepractice |
_version_ |
1719365967374450688 |