SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA

Indigenization of human resources and mental emancipation were among the priorities, explicit and implicit, of the African political and intellectual elites striving for meaningful independence. Education, namely training and research that was Afro-centric, was perceived as a means--if not sometimes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: WEAVER, HAROLD DODSON
Language:ENG
Published: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst 1985
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8509613
id ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-dissertations-1141
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-dissertations-11412020-12-02T14:27:23Z SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA WEAVER, HAROLD DODSON Indigenization of human resources and mental emancipation were among the priorities, explicit and implicit, of the African political and intellectual elites striving for meaningful independence. Education, namely training and research that was Afro-centric, was perceived as a means--if not sometimes as an end in itself--to achieve these priorities. Concurrently, in order to facilitate national self-assertion, African leaders advocated a context supporting non-alignment abroad and struggling against neo-colonialism at home. Limited resources in Africa made it necessary to utilize foreign training facilities in order to attain a reasonably rapid indigenization (Africanization) of human resources. Among those countries intervening with offers of education aid was the USSR, with a variety of formal and nonformal training programs. Innovation was shown both in its curricular and in its admissions procedures. In relationship to African priorities, Lumumba Friendship University and other Soviet training programs--formal and nonformal--may be characterized as participating in the processes of African indigenization, democratization, and conscientization, of which the latter was not welcomed by all African governments in power. Soviet research on Africa, with the support of Soviet political leadership at the highest level, was on record as having a willingness to place its resources at the disposal of the Third World decolonization movements. A significant increase in the quantity and quality of Soviet research on Africa occurred. A reorganization of African studies created a specialized institute on Africa. Soviet researchers were able to go beyond the secondary sources to which they had been previously restricted by colonial isolation to carry out policy-oriented research aimed, at least partly, at aiding the African decolonization efforts, including studies on the political role of the peasantry, resistance to colonialism, and the unity of African languages. 1985-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8509613 Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest ENG ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Educational sociology
collection NDLTD
language ENG
sources NDLTD
topic Educational sociology
spellingShingle Educational sociology
WEAVER, HAROLD DODSON
SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA
description Indigenization of human resources and mental emancipation were among the priorities, explicit and implicit, of the African political and intellectual elites striving for meaningful independence. Education, namely training and research that was Afro-centric, was perceived as a means--if not sometimes as an end in itself--to achieve these priorities. Concurrently, in order to facilitate national self-assertion, African leaders advocated a context supporting non-alignment abroad and struggling against neo-colonialism at home. Limited resources in Africa made it necessary to utilize foreign training facilities in order to attain a reasonably rapid indigenization (Africanization) of human resources. Among those countries intervening with offers of education aid was the USSR, with a variety of formal and nonformal training programs. Innovation was shown both in its curricular and in its admissions procedures. In relationship to African priorities, Lumumba Friendship University and other Soviet training programs--formal and nonformal--may be characterized as participating in the processes of African indigenization, democratization, and conscientization, of which the latter was not welcomed by all African governments in power. Soviet research on Africa, with the support of Soviet political leadership at the highest level, was on record as having a willingness to place its resources at the disposal of the Third World decolonization movements. A significant increase in the quantity and quality of Soviet research on Africa occurred. A reorganization of African studies created a specialized institute on Africa. Soviet researchers were able to go beyond the secondary sources to which they had been previously restricted by colonial isolation to carry out policy-oriented research aimed, at least partly, at aiding the African decolonization efforts, including studies on the political role of the peasantry, resistance to colonialism, and the unity of African languages.
author WEAVER, HAROLD DODSON
author_facet WEAVER, HAROLD DODSON
author_sort WEAVER, HAROLD DODSON
title SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA
title_short SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA
title_full SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA
title_fullStr SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA
title_full_unstemmed SOVIET TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS FOR AFRICA
title_sort soviet training and research programs for africa
publisher ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
publishDate 1985
url https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8509613
work_keys_str_mv AT weaverharolddodson soviettrainingandresearchprogramsforafrica
_version_ 1719363001932316672