THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776

This dissertation examines John Dickinson's political rhetoric from 1764 to 1776 in order to understand more fully and accurately his practice of moderation. Most who have written about Dickinson suggest that he was a moderate man. Too often, however, that observation has led to the assumption...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HYNES, SANDRA SARKELA
Language:ENG
Published: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst 1982
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8229564
id ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-dissertations-1107
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UMASS-oai-scholarworks.umass.edu-dissertations-11072020-12-02T14:26:56Z THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776 HYNES, SANDRA SARKELA This dissertation examines John Dickinson's political rhetoric from 1764 to 1776 in order to understand more fully and accurately his practice of moderation. Most who have written about Dickinson suggest that he was a moderate man. Too often, however, that observation has led to the assumption that Dickinson was, as a result, inactive, timid or indecisive. Further, Dickinson's life after 1768 is neglected by scholars, as is consideration of Dickinson's notions of political strategy. In contrast, this research is based on three assumptions: (1) that John Dickinson was a very active man; (2) that the years after 1768 are critical to an understanding of Dickinson's character; and (3) that his views of political strategy are a key to understanding his seemingly paradoxical behavior. John Dickinson defended the need for moderation in all behavior, both personal and political. But he was not an uncommitted or passive moderate, and he was rarely indecisive. He was an active moderate. An important conclusion to be drawn from this overview of Dickinson's rhetoric is that for Dickinson, rhetorical activity meant political activity. Verbal expression of political beliefs was a significant political act in itself. It was also part of his strategy for social change. Rhetoric gave the movement a common ground on which united mass support could be built. Further, petitions of protest legitimized the use of more coercive measures later. Thus, Dickinson's political rhetoric was an essential part of his practice of active moderation. Finally, if we consider the content of Dickinson's rhetoric in light of his continued political success, we discover that Pennsylvania resistance was built on a great, moderate majority; not the Quaker "moderates," led by Joseph Galloway, but the "truly moderate" Presbyterians, mechanics, artisans, and progressive Quaker lawyers, led by John Dickinson and Charles Thomson. 1982-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8229564 Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest ENG ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Communication
collection NDLTD
language ENG
sources NDLTD
topic Communication
spellingShingle Communication
HYNES, SANDRA SARKELA
THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776
description This dissertation examines John Dickinson's political rhetoric from 1764 to 1776 in order to understand more fully and accurately his practice of moderation. Most who have written about Dickinson suggest that he was a moderate man. Too often, however, that observation has led to the assumption that Dickinson was, as a result, inactive, timid or indecisive. Further, Dickinson's life after 1768 is neglected by scholars, as is consideration of Dickinson's notions of political strategy. In contrast, this research is based on three assumptions: (1) that John Dickinson was a very active man; (2) that the years after 1768 are critical to an understanding of Dickinson's character; and (3) that his views of political strategy are a key to understanding his seemingly paradoxical behavior. John Dickinson defended the need for moderation in all behavior, both personal and political. But he was not an uncommitted or passive moderate, and he was rarely indecisive. He was an active moderate. An important conclusion to be drawn from this overview of Dickinson's rhetoric is that for Dickinson, rhetorical activity meant political activity. Verbal expression of political beliefs was a significant political act in itself. It was also part of his strategy for social change. Rhetoric gave the movement a common ground on which united mass support could be built. Further, petitions of protest legitimized the use of more coercive measures later. Thus, Dickinson's political rhetoric was an essential part of his practice of active moderation. Finally, if we consider the content of Dickinson's rhetoric in light of his continued political success, we discover that Pennsylvania resistance was built on a great, moderate majority; not the Quaker "moderates," led by Joseph Galloway, but the "truly moderate" Presbyterians, mechanics, artisans, and progressive Quaker lawyers, led by John Dickinson and Charles Thomson.
author HYNES, SANDRA SARKELA
author_facet HYNES, SANDRA SARKELA
author_sort HYNES, SANDRA SARKELA
title THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776
title_short THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776
title_full THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776
title_fullStr THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776
title_full_unstemmed THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF JOHN DICKINSON, 1764-1776
title_sort political rhetoric of john dickinson, 1764-1776
publisher ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
publishDate 1982
url https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8229564
work_keys_str_mv AT hynessandrasarkela thepoliticalrhetoricofjohndickinson17641776
AT hynessandrasarkela politicalrhetoricofjohndickinson17641776
_version_ 1719362991329116160