Transitivity in Cantonese

This dissertation studies the notion of transitivity in Cantonese. Conventionally, transitivity is defined in terms of subject and object. If a sentence has both subject and object, it is transitive. If a sentence only has a subject, then the sentence is intransitive. This way of defining transitivi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsang, Chi Chung Aaron
Other Authors: O'Grady, William
Published: University of Hawaii at Manoa 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10125/6877
id ndltd-UHAWAII-oai-scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu-10125-6877
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UHAWAII-oai-scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu-10125-68772013-01-08T11:10:03ZTransitivity in CantoneseTsang, Chi Chung AaronThis dissertation studies the notion of transitivity in Cantonese. Conventionally, transitivity is defined in terms of subject and object. If a sentence has both subject and object, it is transitive. If a sentence only has a subject, then the sentence is intransitive. This way of defining transitivity may seem useful in many languages. However, it does not work very well in Chinese languages. Chinese languages are well known for lacking case marking and agreement. Therefore, subjects and objects are defined solely on the basis of word order. Being SVO in nature, when there is an NP following the main verb, the NP can be considered to be the object, and the sentence is transitive. Yet this way of defining transitivity encounters problems, especially when some verbs, such as heui 'to go' or fan 'to sleep' in Cantonese, which do not require any object semantically, are followed by an object-like NP. The analyses given for these verbs vary from linguist to linguist. Some linguists argue that they are transitive, whereas others suggest the opposite. This dissertation argues that the best way to determine transitivity is by applying syntactic tests to problematic constructions. Using Cantonese as the primary data, this dissertation reexamines eight problematic constructions that can be argued as being either transitive or intransitive. Various syntactic tests will be employed, and conclusions are drawn based on the results of these tests.xiii, 249 leavesUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaO'Grady, William2009-03-06T19:20:22Z2009-03-06T19:20:22Z2003-082003-08ThesisTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/6877All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/2092
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description This dissertation studies the notion of transitivity in Cantonese. Conventionally, transitivity is defined in terms of subject and object. If a sentence has both subject and object, it is transitive. If a sentence only has a subject, then the sentence is intransitive. This way of defining transitivity may seem useful in many languages. However, it does not work very well in Chinese languages. Chinese languages are well known for lacking case marking and agreement. Therefore, subjects and objects are defined solely on the basis of word order. Being SVO in nature, when there is an NP following the main verb, the NP can be considered to be the object, and the sentence is transitive. Yet this way of defining transitivity encounters problems, especially when some verbs, such as heui 'to go' or fan 'to sleep' in Cantonese, which do not require any object semantically, are followed by an object-like NP. The analyses given for these verbs vary from linguist to linguist. Some linguists argue that they are transitive, whereas others suggest the opposite. This dissertation argues that the best way to determine transitivity is by applying syntactic tests to problematic constructions. Using Cantonese as the primary data, this dissertation reexamines eight problematic constructions that can be argued as being either transitive or intransitive. Various syntactic tests will be employed, and conclusions are drawn based on the results of these tests. === xiii, 249 leaves
author2 O'Grady, William
author_facet O'Grady, William
Tsang, Chi Chung Aaron
author Tsang, Chi Chung Aaron
spellingShingle Tsang, Chi Chung Aaron
Transitivity in Cantonese
author_sort Tsang, Chi Chung Aaron
title Transitivity in Cantonese
title_short Transitivity in Cantonese
title_full Transitivity in Cantonese
title_fullStr Transitivity in Cantonese
title_full_unstemmed Transitivity in Cantonese
title_sort transitivity in cantonese
publisher University of Hawaii at Manoa
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10125/6877
work_keys_str_mv AT tsangchichungaaron transitivityincantonese
_version_ 1716505363016056832