Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2008. === Nematode communities are potentially excellent indicators of soil health. Assessing these nematodes communities using molecular and morphological techniques may seem straight forward. However, many challenges exist in implementing molecular te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quintero, Tonia G
Language:en-US
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20923
id ndltd-UHAWAII-oai-scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu-10125-20923
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UHAWAII-oai-scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu-10125-209232013-01-08T11:16:28ZAssessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methodsQuintero, Tonia GThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2008.Nematode communities are potentially excellent indicators of soil health. Assessing these nematodes communities using molecular and morphological techniques may seem straight forward. However, many challenges exist in implementing molecular techniques. First, molecular techniques employed to study nematode communities generally involve DNA extraction, PCR, cloning and molecular sequencing. Each of these steps can introduce bias into the analysis of a nematode community. Using morphology to identify and assess nematode soil health is cumbersome as well. Systematic knowledge of the nematode fauna is essential in order to assign nematodes to their appropriate classification. In new environments permanent slides and collaboration with laboratories that extensively work on nematode taxonomy for adequate identification of nematodes is essential. As a result, attempting to assess the health of soil should require multiple nematode faunal analyses over time which includes (1) comparison of two methods, (2) Gap analyses and (3) extraction methods. It is believed that these experiments have provided pertinent information to help in the quest of measuring and monitoring soil health. However, there is not adequate information to confidently determine if the Manoa Falls Trail sites were "healthier" in comparison to the Whitmore site.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 151-152).Also available by subscription via World Wide Web153 leaves, bound 29 cm2011-07-22T00:15:41Z2011-07-22T00:15:41Z2008ThesisText9780549596226http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20923en-USTheses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Hawaii at Manoa) no. 5069All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
collection NDLTD
language en-US
sources NDLTD
description Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2008. === Nematode communities are potentially excellent indicators of soil health. Assessing these nematodes communities using molecular and morphological techniques may seem straight forward. However, many challenges exist in implementing molecular techniques. First, molecular techniques employed to study nematode communities generally involve DNA extraction, PCR, cloning and molecular sequencing. Each of these steps can introduce bias into the analysis of a nematode community. Using morphology to identify and assess nematode soil health is cumbersome as well. Systematic knowledge of the nematode fauna is essential in order to assign nematodes to their appropriate classification. In new environments permanent slides and collaboration with laboratories that extensively work on nematode taxonomy for adequate identification of nematodes is essential. As a result, attempting to assess the health of soil should require multiple nematode faunal analyses over time which includes (1) comparison of two methods, (2) Gap analyses and (3) extraction methods. It is believed that these experiments have provided pertinent information to help in the quest of measuring and monitoring soil health. However, there is not adequate information to confidently determine if the Manoa Falls Trail sites were "healthier" in comparison to the Whitmore site. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 151-152). === Also available by subscription via World Wide Web === 153 leaves, bound 29 cm
author Quintero, Tonia G
spellingShingle Quintero, Tonia G
Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods
author_facet Quintero, Tonia G
author_sort Quintero, Tonia G
title Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods
title_short Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods
title_full Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods
title_fullStr Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of four soil nematode communities in Hawaii by different methods
title_sort assessment of four soil nematode communities in hawaii by different methods
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20923
work_keys_str_mv AT quinterotoniag assessmentoffoursoilnematodecommunitiesinhawaiibydifferentmethods
_version_ 1716506589464100864