Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice

The purpose of this research was to explore how counsellors self-monitor their day-to-day ethical practices. A qualitative methodology, interpretive description (Thorne, Kirkham, & McDonald-Ernes, 1997), was selected as a means of attaining a description of the monitoring process that would d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stoll, Tara
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9781
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-9781
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-97812018-01-05T17:34:57Z Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice Stoll, Tara The purpose of this research was to explore how counsellors self-monitor their day-to-day ethical practices. A qualitative methodology, interpretive description (Thorne, Kirkham, & McDonald-Ernes, 1997), was selected as a means of attaining a description of the monitoring process that would depict the commonalities among the participant sample while preserving the unique experience of the individual. Counsellors who had two to seven years of post-graduation (Master's level) experience and who were thought to be self-reflective and familiar with the ethical codes of the counselling profession were nominated by their former University professors. Participants included six female and two male Caucasian counsellors between the ages of 39 and 47. The counsellors engaged in individual audio taped interviews in which they answered the following question: What are the ways that you self-monitor your ethics of practice? The interview began with a free-form description of the monitoring process and concluded with a series of questions pertaining to particular aspects of the monitoring process (e.g., precipitating cues, frequency of engagement). Data analysis involved immersion in individual audio tapes and transcripts, searching for common themes within the individual case, and reflection on the data set as a whole asking, "What is happening here?" and "What am I learning about this?" (Thorne et al., 1997). Results suggest that the monitoring process 1) is a component of day-to-day ethical practice; 2) consists of a set of strategies considered to be either reactive or proactive; and 3) evolves with time and may be somewhat developmental. Results are considered in relation to previous and future research, counsellor training, and regulation of ethical practices of current members of the counselling profession. Education, Faculty of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), Department of Graduate 2009-06-29T16:58:11Z 2009-06-29T16:58:11Z 1999 1999-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9781 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 8264963 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The purpose of this research was to explore how counsellors self-monitor their day-to-day ethical practices. A qualitative methodology, interpretive description (Thorne, Kirkham, & McDonald-Ernes, 1997), was selected as a means of attaining a description of the monitoring process that would depict the commonalities among the participant sample while preserving the unique experience of the individual. Counsellors who had two to seven years of post-graduation (Master's level) experience and who were thought to be self-reflective and familiar with the ethical codes of the counselling profession were nominated by their former University professors. Participants included six female and two male Caucasian counsellors between the ages of 39 and 47. The counsellors engaged in individual audio taped interviews in which they answered the following question: What are the ways that you self-monitor your ethics of practice? The interview began with a free-form description of the monitoring process and concluded with a series of questions pertaining to particular aspects of the monitoring process (e.g., precipitating cues, frequency of engagement). Data analysis involved immersion in individual audio tapes and transcripts, searching for common themes within the individual case, and reflection on the data set as a whole asking, "What is happening here?" and "What am I learning about this?" (Thorne et al., 1997). Results suggest that the monitoring process 1) is a component of day-to-day ethical practice; 2) consists of a set of strategies considered to be either reactive or proactive; and 3) evolves with time and may be somewhat developmental. Results are considered in relation to previous and future research, counsellor training, and regulation of ethical practices of current members of the counselling profession. === Education, Faculty of === Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), Department of === Graduate
author Stoll, Tara
spellingShingle Stoll, Tara
Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
author_facet Stoll, Tara
author_sort Stoll, Tara
title Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
title_short Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
title_full Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
title_fullStr Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
title_full_unstemmed Counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
title_sort counsellors’ self-monitoring of day-to-day ethical practice
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9781
work_keys_str_mv AT stolltara counsellorsselfmonitoringofdaytodayethicalpractice
_version_ 1718588366953381888