Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision

The study addresses the process of teacher development in the context of close collegial relations. It is a case study of two teachers, Mary and Sadie, who worked collaboratively over two school years in a series of reciprocal cycles of clinical supervision. The main purposes the teachers held fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Langmuir, David Allan
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9523
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-9523
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-95232018-01-05T17:34:49Z Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision Langmuir, David Allan Observation (Educational method) Teaching teams The study addresses the process of teacher development in the context of close collegial relations. It is a case study of two teachers, Mary and Sadie, who worked collaboratively over two school years in a series of reciprocal cycles of clinical supervision. The main purposes the teachers held for the process were to develop their understanding about their teaching practices in order to grow professionally and to acquire new skills in supervision. Their beliefs, behaviours, and knowledge contributed to shape their relationship and serve their respective needs for growth. An interpretive methodology was employed. The research approach was derived from the theoretical perspective of George Herbert Mead (1932, 1934, 1938). This provided for an analytical description and interpretation of the meanings and knowledge constructed socially by the participating teachers about clinical supervision, collegiality and teacher development. It also enabled the identification of a number of factors which influenced the teachers' development in the context of a collegial relationship. The teachers practiced new behaviours in an unfamiliar context of close colleagueship in order to incorporate research-based knowledge into their practical working lives. They devoted considerable effort and attention during the first year to the mechanics of clinical supervision in order to become more proficient with the process. In the second year of the study, the teachers explicitly rejected the term "clinical supervision" in favour of "reflective conferencing". The new terminology reflected their deeper understanding about the processes of collaboration and reflection. As their relationship, knowledge and skills developed, they became more thoughtful about collaboration and purposeful about facilitating each other's development. The teachers discovered that change takes time and occurs incrementally. Trust was required from both colleagues, in the process and in each other, as they took turns observing each other teach and then meeting to discuss matters related to their instructional practice. A culture of collaboration took hold, albeit more slowly than either had envisioned. Through repeated practice in reflective conferencing, they acquired an appreciation of the challenges and benefits of collaboration for the promotion of teacher development. Education, Faculty of Educational Studies (EDST), Department of Graduate 2009-06-22T17:17:30Z 2009-06-22T17:17:30Z 1998 1998-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9523 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 10593150 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Observation (Educational method)
Teaching teams
spellingShingle Observation (Educational method)
Teaching teams
Langmuir, David Allan
Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
description The study addresses the process of teacher development in the context of close collegial relations. It is a case study of two teachers, Mary and Sadie, who worked collaboratively over two school years in a series of reciprocal cycles of clinical supervision. The main purposes the teachers held for the process were to develop their understanding about their teaching practices in order to grow professionally and to acquire new skills in supervision. Their beliefs, behaviours, and knowledge contributed to shape their relationship and serve their respective needs for growth. An interpretive methodology was employed. The research approach was derived from the theoretical perspective of George Herbert Mead (1932, 1934, 1938). This provided for an analytical description and interpretation of the meanings and knowledge constructed socially by the participating teachers about clinical supervision, collegiality and teacher development. It also enabled the identification of a number of factors which influenced the teachers' development in the context of a collegial relationship. The teachers practiced new behaviours in an unfamiliar context of close colleagueship in order to incorporate research-based knowledge into their practical working lives. They devoted considerable effort and attention during the first year to the mechanics of clinical supervision in order to become more proficient with the process. In the second year of the study, the teachers explicitly rejected the term "clinical supervision" in favour of "reflective conferencing". The new terminology reflected their deeper understanding about the processes of collaboration and reflection. As their relationship, knowledge and skills developed, they became more thoughtful about collaboration and purposeful about facilitating each other's development. The teachers discovered that change takes time and occurs incrementally. Trust was required from both colleagues, in the process and in each other, as they took turns observing each other teach and then meeting to discuss matters related to their instructional practice. A culture of collaboration took hold, albeit more slowly than either had envisioned. Through repeated practice in reflective conferencing, they acquired an appreciation of the challenges and benefits of collaboration for the promotion of teacher development. === Education, Faculty of === Educational Studies (EDST), Department of === Graduate
author Langmuir, David Allan
author_facet Langmuir, David Allan
author_sort Langmuir, David Allan
title Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
title_short Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
title_full Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
title_fullStr Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
title_full_unstemmed Making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
title_sort making sense of teacher collaboration : a case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9523
work_keys_str_mv AT langmuirdavidallan makingsenseofteachercollaborationacasestudyoftwoteachersengagementinclinicalsupervision
_version_ 1718588298424745984