The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic

My intent with this thesis is to outline an aesthetic relation that challenges the Lacanian conception of a human subject “captured and tortured by language” (Seminar III 243). Through a reading of two works, a novel and a film, I demonstrate that the Lacanian symbolic—the register of language—canno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruby, Michael
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/57888
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-57888
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-578882018-01-05T17:28:56Z The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic Ruby, Michael My intent with this thesis is to outline an aesthetic relation that challenges the Lacanian conception of a human subject “captured and tortured by language” (Seminar III 243). Through a reading of two works, a novel and a film, I demonstrate that the Lacanian symbolic—the register of language—cannot sufficiently describe the processes of subjectivation manifest in the works. A consideration of the subject as participating in a reflexive construction of psychical reality through the proliferation of fantasy is necessary to comprehend these works and the unique relation among them. Jean Laplanche’s theory of fantasy serves a model for this understanding. The first of these works is a novel published by the Argentine writer, Adolfo Bioy Casares, in 1941, The Invention of Morel, and the second is the well-known film from the French New Wave, Last Year at Marienbad from 1961, directed by Alain Resnais and written by novelist Alain Robbe-Grillet. These works stage a scene of fantasy (a fantasy of seduction) that involves the intervention of image-making technologies—this intervention allows the fantasy scene to self-duplicate to the point of organizing the formal arrangement of the works themselves. Finally, the production of The Invention of Morel and Last Year at Marienbad comes to replicate this same fantasy scene, suggesting that fantasy itself, through aesthetic (re-)production, can perform the function that Lacan’s ascribes to the symbolic—that is, insistence. Arts, Faculty of English, Department of Graduate 2016-04-26T18:01:51Z 2016-04-27T02:02:02 2016 2015-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/57888 eng Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description My intent with this thesis is to outline an aesthetic relation that challenges the Lacanian conception of a human subject “captured and tortured by language” (Seminar III 243). Through a reading of two works, a novel and a film, I demonstrate that the Lacanian symbolic—the register of language—cannot sufficiently describe the processes of subjectivation manifest in the works. A consideration of the subject as participating in a reflexive construction of psychical reality through the proliferation of fantasy is necessary to comprehend these works and the unique relation among them. Jean Laplanche’s theory of fantasy serves a model for this understanding. The first of these works is a novel published by the Argentine writer, Adolfo Bioy Casares, in 1941, The Invention of Morel, and the second is the well-known film from the French New Wave, Last Year at Marienbad from 1961, directed by Alain Resnais and written by novelist Alain Robbe-Grillet. These works stage a scene of fantasy (a fantasy of seduction) that involves the intervention of image-making technologies—this intervention allows the fantasy scene to self-duplicate to the point of organizing the formal arrangement of the works themselves. Finally, the production of The Invention of Morel and Last Year at Marienbad comes to replicate this same fantasy scene, suggesting that fantasy itself, through aesthetic (re-)production, can perform the function that Lacan’s ascribes to the symbolic—that is, insistence. === Arts, Faculty of === English, Department of === Graduate
author Ruby, Michael
spellingShingle Ruby, Michael
The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic
author_facet Ruby, Michael
author_sort Ruby, Michael
title The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic
title_short The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic
title_full The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic
title_fullStr The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic
title_full_unstemmed The impossible love of images : Morel, Marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the Lacanian symbolic
title_sort impossible love of images : morel, marienbad, and the (re-)production of fantasy beyond the lacanian symbolic
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/57888
work_keys_str_mv AT rubymichael theimpossibleloveofimagesmorelmarienbadandthereproductionoffantasybeyondthelacaniansymbolic
AT rubymichael impossibleloveofimagesmorelmarienbadandthereproductionoffantasybeyondthelacaniansymbolic
_version_ 1718585201809948672