Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems

Conceptual database design is the most critical and difficult phase in designing a database centered application. It usually requires database design experts which are hard to find and expensive. There has been some effort in building expert systems, including the View Creation System (VCS), to s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ding, Jie
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5262
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-5262
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-52622018-01-05T17:32:30Z Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems Ding, Jie Conceptual database design is the most critical and difficult phase in designing a database centered application. It usually requires database design experts which are hard to find and expensive. There has been some effort in building expert systems, including the View Creation System (VCS), to support this design process. However, all of these systems lack commonsense knowledge human experts have and therefore can not provide effective support to the user. A prototype commonsense knowledge base, the Commonsense Business Reasoner (CBR), has been built for the VCS. But it is not filly implemented and not connected to the VCS. The usefulness of commonsense knowledge in a database design expert system has not been studied. In this paper, a new domain of relevance ontology was proposed to store domain of relevance for commonsense knowledge. Combined with the Naive Semantics ontology used in the CBR, a new commonsense knowledge base structure was built and implemented. This was integrated into the original VCS and can provide interactive commonsense knowledge support during the design process. Other improvements were also done to the VCS to make it more user friendly. A fill scale empirical study was conducted to test the effectiveness of the commonsense module. The results indicated subjects perceived the system with commonsense knowledge easier to use and finished the task in less time. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the design quality. Explanations to these results are discussed as well as future research directions. Business, Sauder School of Graduate 2009-02-27T20:21:08Z 2009-02-27T20:21:08Z 1994 1994-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5262 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 1675804 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Conceptual database design is the most critical and difficult phase in designing a database centered application. It usually requires database design experts which are hard to find and expensive. There has been some effort in building expert systems, including the View Creation System (VCS), to support this design process. However, all of these systems lack commonsense knowledge human experts have and therefore can not provide effective support to the user. A prototype commonsense knowledge base, the Commonsense Business Reasoner (CBR), has been built for the VCS. But it is not filly implemented and not connected to the VCS. The usefulness of commonsense knowledge in a database design expert system has not been studied. In this paper, a new domain of relevance ontology was proposed to store domain of relevance for commonsense knowledge. Combined with the Naive Semantics ontology used in the CBR, a new commonsense knowledge base structure was built and implemented. This was integrated into the original VCS and can provide interactive commonsense knowledge support during the design process. Other improvements were also done to the VCS to make it more user friendly. A fill scale empirical study was conducted to test the effectiveness of the commonsense module. The results indicated subjects perceived the system with commonsense knowledge easier to use and finished the task in less time. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the design quality. Explanations to these results are discussed as well as future research directions. === Business, Sauder School of === Graduate
author Ding, Jie
spellingShingle Ding, Jie
Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
author_facet Ding, Jie
author_sort Ding, Jie
title Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
title_short Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
title_full Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
title_fullStr Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
title_full_unstemmed Commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
title_sort commonsense knowledge support in database design expert systems
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5262
work_keys_str_mv AT dingjie commonsenseknowledgesupportindatabasedesignexpertsystems
_version_ 1718587064505597952