Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion

Woodpeckers are a remarkable clade of birds commonly known to use forceful blows of their beaks to drill holes in trees while foraging for boring insects or sap, and they also use their beaks to excavate nest cavities and loudly announce their territory by drumming. They regularly tolerate forces te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ross, Erica
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/50869
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-50869
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-508692018-01-05T17:27:44Z Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion Ross, Erica Woodpeckers are a remarkable clade of birds commonly known to use forceful blows of their beaks to drill holes in trees while foraging for boring insects or sap, and they also use their beaks to excavate nest cavities and loudly announce their territory by drumming. They regularly tolerate forces ten times greater than those that would give a human a concussion. Human concussions are the focus of a lot of attention and research efforts recently, especially in the world of sports and veteran's affairs where head injury's debilitating effects on immediate and long-term health are becoming more recognised. Woodpeckers are good organisms to study to gain insights into concussions. Many factors have been proposed to contribute to the woodpeckers’ ability to withstand the blows to its head. Some hypotheses are more likely than others, but the topic suffers from a lack of data. This thesis addresses the hypothesis that the brain is semi-isolated from the forces experienced by the rest of the head, and the hypothesis that woodpeckers have minimal space between their brains and skulls, and minimal cerebrospinal fluid. We used high-speed video analysis of wild captured Pileated Woodpeckers to evaluate whether there was any evidence that the brain case is semi-isolated from the rest of the woodpecker’s head. The acceleration profiles of points on the head and on the beak were not significantly different, and the distances between the head point and the beak point before and after a strike also were not significantly different. We used CT and MRI scans to visualize and measure the space between the brain and skull. The space was quantified and was not smaller than might be expected once scaling between a human’s head and a woodpecker’s head was taken into account. We conclude that woodpeckers’ resistance to head injury is not likely due to force deflection away from the brain, or especially tight packing of the brain, and hypothesize that it is due to scaling effects, a short impact duration, woodpeckers’ smooth brain, and possible neuroprotective mechanisms. Science, Faculty of Zoology, Department of Graduate 2014-10-23T22:34:50Z 2014-10-23T22:34:50Z 2014 2014-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/50869 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Woodpeckers are a remarkable clade of birds commonly known to use forceful blows of their beaks to drill holes in trees while foraging for boring insects or sap, and they also use their beaks to excavate nest cavities and loudly announce their territory by drumming. They regularly tolerate forces ten times greater than those that would give a human a concussion. Human concussions are the focus of a lot of attention and research efforts recently, especially in the world of sports and veteran's affairs where head injury's debilitating effects on immediate and long-term health are becoming more recognised. Woodpeckers are good organisms to study to gain insights into concussions. Many factors have been proposed to contribute to the woodpeckers’ ability to withstand the blows to its head. Some hypotheses are more likely than others, but the topic suffers from a lack of data. This thesis addresses the hypothesis that the brain is semi-isolated from the forces experienced by the rest of the head, and the hypothesis that woodpeckers have minimal space between their brains and skulls, and minimal cerebrospinal fluid. We used high-speed video analysis of wild captured Pileated Woodpeckers to evaluate whether there was any evidence that the brain case is semi-isolated from the rest of the woodpecker’s head. The acceleration profiles of points on the head and on the beak were not significantly different, and the distances between the head point and the beak point before and after a strike also were not significantly different. We used CT and MRI scans to visualize and measure the space between the brain and skull. The space was quantified and was not smaller than might be expected once scaling between a human’s head and a woodpecker’s head was taken into account. We conclude that woodpeckers’ resistance to head injury is not likely due to force deflection away from the brain, or especially tight packing of the brain, and hypothesize that it is due to scaling effects, a short impact duration, woodpeckers’ smooth brain, and possible neuroprotective mechanisms. === Science, Faculty of === Zoology, Department of === Graduate
author Ross, Erica
spellingShingle Ross, Erica
Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
author_facet Ross, Erica
author_sort Ross, Erica
title Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
title_short Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
title_full Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
title_fullStr Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
title_full_unstemmed Woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
title_sort woodpeckers and the biomechanics of concussion
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/50869
work_keys_str_mv AT rosserica woodpeckersandthebiomechanicsofconcussion
_version_ 1718584506556874752