Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand

The global trends of rapid urbanization and increasing disparity between rich and poor have been particularly extreme in the case of Thailand. The benefits of Thailand’s spectacular economic growth have been unequally distributed. For many of the over one million slum dwellers of Bangkok this bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pratt, James Holden
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5026
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-5026
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-50262018-01-05T17:32:23Z Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand Pratt, James Holden The global trends of rapid urbanization and increasing disparity between rich and poor have been particularly extreme in the case of Thailand. The benefits of Thailand’s spectacular economic growth have been unequally distributed. For many of the over one million slum dwellers of Bangkok this boom period has resulted in mass eviction. Recent evidence suggests that slum communities in regional cities are also facing a trend of increased eviction. This case study analyzes the work of the Human Settlement Foundation, a Thai nongovernmental organization (NGO) which supports the formation and development of community—based organizations as a means for enabling and empowering Thailand’s urban poor to solve their shelter problems. The study focuses on the role of program evaluation in strengthening NGO capacities. It analyzes the purposes, methods, levels of participation, strengths, and weaknesses of external and internal evaluation processes as they are applied to NGOs. The thesis links field evidence with recent literature about participatory program evaluation to identify opportunities and constraints which might arise with the introduction of more collaborative evaluation processes. Basic data sources include semi—structured interviews; participant observation; primary documents such as project proposals, progress reports, memoranda, and brochures; and secondary documents such as studies, reports, and newspaper articles. The study finds that both external and internal evaluation have limited potential for strengthening NGO capacities. It develops a hypothesis about how more broadly participatory collaborative evaluation would affect the following five NGO capacity variables: relations with funding agencies, management abilities, accountability to clients, relations with other NGOs, and relations with government. Applied Science, Faculty of Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of Graduate 2009-02-25 2009-02-25 1993 1994-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5026 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 1844320 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The global trends of rapid urbanization and increasing disparity between rich and poor have been particularly extreme in the case of Thailand. The benefits of Thailand’s spectacular economic growth have been unequally distributed. For many of the over one million slum dwellers of Bangkok this boom period has resulted in mass eviction. Recent evidence suggests that slum communities in regional cities are also facing a trend of increased eviction. This case study analyzes the work of the Human Settlement Foundation, a Thai nongovernmental organization (NGO) which supports the formation and development of community—based organizations as a means for enabling and empowering Thailand’s urban poor to solve their shelter problems. The study focuses on the role of program evaluation in strengthening NGO capacities. It analyzes the purposes, methods, levels of participation, strengths, and weaknesses of external and internal evaluation processes as they are applied to NGOs. The thesis links field evidence with recent literature about participatory program evaluation to identify opportunities and constraints which might arise with the introduction of more collaborative evaluation processes. Basic data sources include semi—structured interviews; participant observation; primary documents such as project proposals, progress reports, memoranda, and brochures; and secondary documents such as studies, reports, and newspaper articles. The study finds that both external and internal evaluation have limited potential for strengthening NGO capacities. It develops a hypothesis about how more broadly participatory collaborative evaluation would affect the following five NGO capacity variables: relations with funding agencies, management abilities, accountability to clients, relations with other NGOs, and relations with government. === Applied Science, Faculty of === Community and Regional Planning (SCARP), School of === Graduate
author Pratt, James Holden
spellingShingle Pratt, James Holden
Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand
author_facet Pratt, James Holden
author_sort Pratt, James Holden
title Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand
title_short Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand
title_full Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand
title_fullStr Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Participatory evaluation of urban poor NGOs in Thailand
title_sort participatory evaluation of urban poor ngos in thailand
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/5026
work_keys_str_mv AT prattjamesholden participatoryevaluationofurbanpoorngosinthailand
_version_ 1718586995785072640