The art and craft of university coordination

The purpose of this study is to understand the apparent acquiescence of senior officials at Alberta’s universities to legislation that might pose a threat to their institutions’ autonomy. In 1975 the Alberta government under the leadership of Premier Peter Lougheed attempted to introduce a mechanis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barmby, James Thomas
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45690
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-45690
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-456902018-01-05T17:27:07Z The art and craft of university coordination Barmby, James Thomas The purpose of this study is to understand the apparent acquiescence of senior officials at Alberta’s universities to legislation that might pose a threat to their institutions’ autonomy. In 1975 the Alberta government under the leadership of Premier Peter Lougheed attempted to introduce a mechanism for coordinating university programs in the Adult Education Act by placing Alberta’s four universities against their will within a system of provincial public post-secondary institutions. The 1975 Act failed to receive third reading due to successful lobbying efforts, yet in 2003 Lougheed's vision was finally realized with the passage of the Post-Secondary Learning Act (PSLA), which enlisted Alberta’s four universities without resistance as members of a provincial system that coordinates post-secondary programming. A historical analysis, this study was framed within the dimensions of Wenger’s Communities of Practice model to analyze the interaction and trust between and among senior university and government officials in their attempts to find agreement on matters concerning the coordination of university programming. The study found that, only where there was evidence of all three dimensions of the Communities of Practice model, was there mutual trust as well as agreement by the university officials on government initiatives regarding the coordination of university programming. The main conclusion of the study is that university officials responded well to the program coordination concerns of the provincial government when the university officials, treated as equals to their government counterparts rather than as agents of government policy, were given the opportunity to participate in the development of the program coordination legislation and policies in conjunction with government officials. Graduate Studies, College of (Okanagan) Graduate 2014-01-02T16:50:12Z 2014-01-02T16:50:12Z 2013 2014-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45690 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description The purpose of this study is to understand the apparent acquiescence of senior officials at Alberta’s universities to legislation that might pose a threat to their institutions’ autonomy. In 1975 the Alberta government under the leadership of Premier Peter Lougheed attempted to introduce a mechanism for coordinating university programs in the Adult Education Act by placing Alberta’s four universities against their will within a system of provincial public post-secondary institutions. The 1975 Act failed to receive third reading due to successful lobbying efforts, yet in 2003 Lougheed's vision was finally realized with the passage of the Post-Secondary Learning Act (PSLA), which enlisted Alberta’s four universities without resistance as members of a provincial system that coordinates post-secondary programming. A historical analysis, this study was framed within the dimensions of Wenger’s Communities of Practice model to analyze the interaction and trust between and among senior university and government officials in their attempts to find agreement on matters concerning the coordination of university programming. The study found that, only where there was evidence of all three dimensions of the Communities of Practice model, was there mutual trust as well as agreement by the university officials on government initiatives regarding the coordination of university programming. The main conclusion of the study is that university officials responded well to the program coordination concerns of the provincial government when the university officials, treated as equals to their government counterparts rather than as agents of government policy, were given the opportunity to participate in the development of the program coordination legislation and policies in conjunction with government officials. === Graduate Studies, College of (Okanagan) === Graduate
author Barmby, James Thomas
spellingShingle Barmby, James Thomas
The art and craft of university coordination
author_facet Barmby, James Thomas
author_sort Barmby, James Thomas
title The art and craft of university coordination
title_short The art and craft of university coordination
title_full The art and craft of university coordination
title_fullStr The art and craft of university coordination
title_full_unstemmed The art and craft of university coordination
title_sort art and craft of university coordination
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45690
work_keys_str_mv AT barmbyjamesthomas theartandcraftofuniversitycoordination
AT barmbyjamesthomas artandcraftofuniversitycoordination
_version_ 1718584115344703488