Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments

Humans are motivated to explore, investigate, and learn about the world around them; in the process of doing so, some groups work and live in environments described as extreme and unusual. Using thematic content analysis, the goal of this dissertation was to better understand coping strategies (Folk...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brcic, Jelena
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45270
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-45270
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-452702018-01-05T17:26:57Z Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments Brcic, Jelena Humans are motivated to explore, investigate, and learn about the world around them; in the process of doing so, some groups work and live in environments described as extreme and unusual. Using thematic content analysis, the goal of this dissertation was to better understand coping strategies (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) and motive images (Winter, 1994) expressed in narratives of four highly skilled groups: astronauts, high-altitude mountaineers, search and rescue (SAR) crews, and small military combat units. Taken together, the findings provided insight into the similarities and differences among groups that work in extreme environments. All four teams relied on problem-focused compared to emotion-focused coping strategies. Soldiers were least likely to mention Planful Problem Solving and most likely to mention Supernatural Protection and Confrontation when compared to the other groups; on the other hand, mountaineers were least likely to mention Seeking Social Support and most likely to mention Self-Control. In relation to motive imagery, all four groups were primarily motivated by need for Achievement, followed by need for Affiliation and need for Power. Soldiers had the highest level of all three motives; astronauts and SAR crews do not differ on any of the three. Differences across occupational and environment type, leadership status, gender, and mission phases were examined. The study provided the first empirical evidence, across mission phases, on how high-altitude mountaineers and SAR crews cope with problems and express their motives. Implications of the research, limitations, and possible future directions were discussed. Arts, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Graduate 2013-10-17T13:29:04Z 2013-10-17T13:29:04Z 2013 2013-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45270 eng CC0 1.0 Universal http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Humans are motivated to explore, investigate, and learn about the world around them; in the process of doing so, some groups work and live in environments described as extreme and unusual. Using thematic content analysis, the goal of this dissertation was to better understand coping strategies (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) and motive images (Winter, 1994) expressed in narratives of four highly skilled groups: astronauts, high-altitude mountaineers, search and rescue (SAR) crews, and small military combat units. Taken together, the findings provided insight into the similarities and differences among groups that work in extreme environments. All four teams relied on problem-focused compared to emotion-focused coping strategies. Soldiers were least likely to mention Planful Problem Solving and most likely to mention Supernatural Protection and Confrontation when compared to the other groups; on the other hand, mountaineers were least likely to mention Seeking Social Support and most likely to mention Self-Control. In relation to motive imagery, all four groups were primarily motivated by need for Achievement, followed by need for Affiliation and need for Power. Soldiers had the highest level of all three motives; astronauts and SAR crews do not differ on any of the three. Differences across occupational and environment type, leadership status, gender, and mission phases were examined. The study provided the first empirical evidence, across mission phases, on how high-altitude mountaineers and SAR crews cope with problems and express their motives. Implications of the research, limitations, and possible future directions were discussed. === Arts, Faculty of === Psychology, Department of === Graduate
author Brcic, Jelena
spellingShingle Brcic, Jelena
Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
author_facet Brcic, Jelena
author_sort Brcic, Jelena
title Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
title_short Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
title_full Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
title_fullStr Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
title_full_unstemmed Extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
title_sort extreme teams : coping and motive imagery of small, mission-oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45270
work_keys_str_mv AT brcicjelena extremeteamscopingandmotiveimageryofsmallmissionorientedteamsinextremeandunusualenvironments
_version_ 1718584029677092864