Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention
Efficacy research has been the focus of many phonological intervention projects recently (Bernhardt, 1990,1994; Von Bremen, 1990; Howell & Dean, 1995). The importance of conducting efficacy research is not in dispute; rather, researchers are focusing on how outcomes can be optimized in everyd...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/4370 |
id |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-4370 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-43702018-01-05T17:31:59Z Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention Edwards, Susan Melinda Efficacy research has been the focus of many phonological intervention projects recently (Bernhardt, 1990,1994; Von Bremen, 1990; Howell & Dean, 1995). The importance of conducting efficacy research is not in dispute; rather, researchers are focusing on how outcomes can be optimized in everyday clinical situations with typical clinicians given time and financial constraints (Fletcher, Fletcher & Wagner, 1988). The purpose of the present study was to optimize and evaluate the effectiveness of nonlinear phonological theory in typical clinical practise. Intervention took place in bi-weekly sessions over a period of 16 weeks. Data were collected to measure intermediate stages of generalization at six points and generalization to conversational speech was measured at three data points. Relative progress/overall gains in terms of Percent Consonant Correct (PCC) and Wordshape Match (WSM) were compared to subjects from Bernhardt (1990,1993a). Results are discussed in terms of nonlinear phonological theory and more recent developments in the area of constraint theory. Further discussion involves the interaction of phonetics and phonology, especially where physical limitations are concerned. Finally, the process of optimization is discussed in terms of effectiveness and research design. Suggestions for future phonology research based on everyday practise are provided. Medicine, Faculty of Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of Graduate 2009-02-10 2009-02-10 1995 1995-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/4370 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 10389392 bytes application/pdf |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Efficacy research has been the focus of many phonological intervention projects recently
(Bernhardt, 1990,1994; Von Bremen, 1990; Howell & Dean, 1995). The importance of conducting
efficacy research is not in dispute; rather, researchers are focusing on how outcomes can be
optimized in everyday clinical situations with typical clinicians given time and financial
constraints (Fletcher, Fletcher & Wagner, 1988). The purpose of the present study was to optimize
and evaluate the effectiveness of nonlinear phonological theory in typical clinical practise.
Intervention took place in bi-weekly sessions over a period of 16 weeks. Data were collected to
measure intermediate stages of generalization at six points and generalization to conversational
speech was measured at three data points. Relative progress/overall gains in terms of Percent
Consonant Correct (PCC) and Wordshape Match (WSM) were compared to subjects from
Bernhardt (1990,1993a). Results are discussed in terms of nonlinear phonological theory and more
recent developments in the area of constraint theory. Further discussion involves the interaction of
phonetics and phonology, especially where physical limitations are concerned. Finally, the process
of optimization is discussed in terms of effectiveness and research design. Suggestions for future
phonology research based on everyday practise are provided. === Medicine, Faculty of === Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of === Graduate |
author |
Edwards, Susan Melinda |
spellingShingle |
Edwards, Susan Melinda Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
author_facet |
Edwards, Susan Melinda |
author_sort |
Edwards, Susan Melinda |
title |
Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
title_short |
Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
title_full |
Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
title_fullStr |
Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
title_sort |
optimal outcomes of nonlinear phonological intervention |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/4370 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT edwardssusanmelinda optimaloutcomesofnonlinearphonologicalintervention |
_version_ |
1718586778785415168 |