Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting

Blasting techniques and protective measures exist that can mitigate risks associated with flyrock and the nuisance of vibration, and overpressure. However, these are often misused or not used because there are no prescriptive regulatory requirements and typically, urban blasting guidelines do not ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Loeb, Jeffrey Thomas
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/42948
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-42948
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-429482018-01-05T17:25:59Z Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting Loeb, Jeffrey Thomas Blasting techniques and protective measures exist that can mitigate risks associated with flyrock and the nuisance of vibration, and overpressure. However, these are often misused or not used because there are no prescriptive regulatory requirements and typically, urban blasting guidelines do not exist. The relationship between the increasingly negative publicity that the urban blasting industry receives and the existing state of regulatory control on blasting in urban environments is presented. Specific research points include: 1. Incidents of flyrock, vibration and overpressure related to blasting operations in urban environments were investigated across Canada but with a focus in the province of British Columbia. 2. A comparison and evaluation of blasting regulatory control in Canada, United States and Australia are presented. 3. An analysis of incidents and complaints, complemented with the approaches used to regulate blasting was performed. 4. Provincial and municipal regulators, blasting contractors, and blasting consultants were interviewed to seek advice on practical amendments to Canadian regulations to mitigate the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting. At the provincial level, it is recommended that an amendment to WorkSafeBC’s Blasting Regulations Part 21.66 (1) to hold the blasting company, in addition to the blaster, responsible for flyrock incidents will reduce incidents. At the municipal level, it is suggested that a proposed harmonized blasting bylaw, that includes an education plan in the form of an informative pamphlet, will reduce the number of vibration, and overpressure complaints. This blasting bylaw coupled with delivery of the pamphlet should minimize (i) risk to a municipality, (ii) cost and time commitment to a municipality, (iii) complaints made by concerned residents, and (iv) adverse effects on blaster productivity. Applied Science, Faculty of Engineering, School of (Okanagan) Graduate 2012-08-16T17:47:30Z 2012-08-16T17:47:30Z 2012 2012-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/42948 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Blasting techniques and protective measures exist that can mitigate risks associated with flyrock and the nuisance of vibration, and overpressure. However, these are often misused or not used because there are no prescriptive regulatory requirements and typically, urban blasting guidelines do not exist. The relationship between the increasingly negative publicity that the urban blasting industry receives and the existing state of regulatory control on blasting in urban environments is presented. Specific research points include: 1. Incidents of flyrock, vibration and overpressure related to blasting operations in urban environments were investigated across Canada but with a focus in the province of British Columbia. 2. A comparison and evaluation of blasting regulatory control in Canada, United States and Australia are presented. 3. An analysis of incidents and complaints, complemented with the approaches used to regulate blasting was performed. 4. Provincial and municipal regulators, blasting contractors, and blasting consultants were interviewed to seek advice on practical amendments to Canadian regulations to mitigate the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting. At the provincial level, it is recommended that an amendment to WorkSafeBC’s Blasting Regulations Part 21.66 (1) to hold the blasting company, in addition to the blaster, responsible for flyrock incidents will reduce incidents. At the municipal level, it is suggested that a proposed harmonized blasting bylaw, that includes an education plan in the form of an informative pamphlet, will reduce the number of vibration, and overpressure complaints. This blasting bylaw coupled with delivery of the pamphlet should minimize (i) risk to a municipality, (ii) cost and time commitment to a municipality, (iii) complaints made by concerned residents, and (iv) adverse effects on blaster productivity. === Applied Science, Faculty of === Engineering, School of (Okanagan) === Graduate
author Loeb, Jeffrey Thomas
spellingShingle Loeb, Jeffrey Thomas
Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
author_facet Loeb, Jeffrey Thomas
author_sort Loeb, Jeffrey Thomas
title Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
title_short Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
title_full Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
title_fullStr Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
title_sort regulatory mitigation of the adverse environmental effects of urban blasting
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/42948
work_keys_str_mv AT loebjeffreythomas regulatorymitigationoftheadverseenvironmentaleffectsofurbanblasting
_version_ 1718583436064587776