Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement

There is a growing rift between HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay men, manifested in social, economic, structural and political divisiveness which, if not resolved may 'kill' the gay liberation movement. While disasters generally create organizational solidarity, AIDS has operated in r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Botnick, Michael R.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/4022
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-4022
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-40222018-01-05T17:31:47Z Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement Botnick, Michael R. There is a growing rift between HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay men, manifested in social, economic, structural and political divisiveness which, if not resolved may 'kill' the gay liberation movement. While disasters generally create organizational solidarity, AIDS has operated in reverse, spawning a variety of competitive AIDS service organizations, alienating seropositive gays from the mainstream gay community, and disenfranchising seronegative gay men as human and financial resources are redirected towards persons living with HIV and AIDS. Serostatus has become a social marker of societal status, operating in a bimodal discriminatory manner. Seronegative gay men experience discrimination within the gay community as funding for and services to this sector diminish. Seropositive gay men (and the organizations which provide for some of their needs) have culturally, economically and socially dismissed the needs of seronegative gay men (survivor guilt, safer sex education, etc) in favour of providing social and resource based services to seropositive gay men. The social distance between the gay movement and the AIDS movement has correspondingly increased. If this trend continues, it will serve to further push HIVpositive and HIV-negative gay men into polarized camps, resulting in a wider separation of the gay movement from the AIDS movement. The stigmatization of HIV-positive people will subsequently increase both within and outside of the gay movement, and any ability to present a unified Gay Liberation front will correspondingly diminish. Additionally, the emergent notion that to be gay is to be HIV-positive will solidify. This will a) further stigmatize all gay men in the eyes of the non-gay population, and b) exacerbate the rift between HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay men within the gay community, reversing the stigma of HIV such that to be HIV-negative will be a marker of non-gay identity. In short, seropositivity will become the defining element of gayness. In order to avert further divisiveness, and minimization of the gay movement, an effort must be made towards reestablishing the original ideology of cooperation, which was the hallmark of the earlier days of AIDS activism. This will require a debureaucratization of AIDS service organizations; coalition building among AIDS service organizations and gay liberation organizations; and personal attitudinal and behaviour changes on the part of both seropositive and seronegative gays regarding HIV status as a medical, rather than social phenomenon. Arts, Faculty of Sociology, Department of Graduate 2009-01-31 2009-01-31 1995 1995-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/4022 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 8512779 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description There is a growing rift between HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay men, manifested in social, economic, structural and political divisiveness which, if not resolved may 'kill' the gay liberation movement. While disasters generally create organizational solidarity, AIDS has operated in reverse, spawning a variety of competitive AIDS service organizations, alienating seropositive gays from the mainstream gay community, and disenfranchising seronegative gay men as human and financial resources are redirected towards persons living with HIV and AIDS. Serostatus has become a social marker of societal status, operating in a bimodal discriminatory manner. Seronegative gay men experience discrimination within the gay community as funding for and services to this sector diminish. Seropositive gay men (and the organizations which provide for some of their needs) have culturally, economically and socially dismissed the needs of seronegative gay men (survivor guilt, safer sex education, etc) in favour of providing social and resource based services to seropositive gay men. The social distance between the gay movement and the AIDS movement has correspondingly increased. If this trend continues, it will serve to further push HIVpositive and HIV-negative gay men into polarized camps, resulting in a wider separation of the gay movement from the AIDS movement. The stigmatization of HIV-positive people will subsequently increase both within and outside of the gay movement, and any ability to present a unified Gay Liberation front will correspondingly diminish. Additionally, the emergent notion that to be gay is to be HIV-positive will solidify. This will a) further stigmatize all gay men in the eyes of the non-gay population, and b) exacerbate the rift between HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay men within the gay community, reversing the stigma of HIV such that to be HIV-negative will be a marker of non-gay identity. In short, seropositivity will become the defining element of gayness. In order to avert further divisiveness, and minimization of the gay movement, an effort must be made towards reestablishing the original ideology of cooperation, which was the hallmark of the earlier days of AIDS activism. This will require a debureaucratization of AIDS service organizations; coalition building among AIDS service organizations and gay liberation organizations; and personal attitudinal and behaviour changes on the part of both seropositive and seronegative gays regarding HIV status as a medical, rather than social phenomenon. === Arts, Faculty of === Sociology, Department of === Graduate
author Botnick, Michael R.
spellingShingle Botnick, Michael R.
Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
author_facet Botnick, Michael R.
author_sort Botnick, Michael R.
title Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
title_short Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
title_full Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
title_fullStr Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
title_full_unstemmed Social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between HIV positive and HIV negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
title_sort social movement sustainability : an analysis of the rift between hiv positive and hiv negative gay men and its impact on the gay liberation movement
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/4022
work_keys_str_mv AT botnickmichaelr socialmovementsustainabilityananalysisoftheriftbetweenhivpositiveandhivnegativegaymenanditsimpactonthegayliberationmovement
_version_ 1718586669039353856