One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian

To date, there is very little information about the early stages of bilingual language acquisition, and the information available is largely based on diary and anecdotal reports. In this thesis research the productions of one infant A, (1;9) learning English and Norwegian were analysed to provide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lancaster, Paige Elizabeth
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3976
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-3976
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-39762018-01-05T17:31:43Z One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian Lancaster, Paige Elizabeth To date, there is very little information about the early stages of bilingual language acquisition, and the information available is largely based on diary and anecdotal reports. In this thesis research the productions of one infant A, (1;9) learning English and Norwegian were analysed to provide information about the phonological system(s) acquired by a bilingual infant. Two issues where addressed; (1) whether an infant simultaneously acquiring two languages uses a single phonetic inventory or two separate systems, and (2) the effect a bilingual environment has on phonological acquisition. Speech productions were collected via audio recordings during free play, parental diary records and the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Infants f1 989). All data were used to analyse the infant's lexicon. Transcriptions of the recorded data were compared across language environments and target languages in terms of phonetic inventories, syllabic inventories and substitution patterns. At the lexical level, A took the language of the listener into account in that he used a higher proportion of English words in the English environment and a higher percentage of Norwegian words in the Norwegian environment. He did not differentiate phonetic production. A used a single phonetic inventory in his productions of English and Norwegian words. A crosslanguage influence was noted in his system, as it contained both English and Norwegian segments, such as [w], which is part of the English (but not the Norwegian) system, and [0], which occurs in Norwegian, but not English. Medicine, Faculty of Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of Graduate 2009-01-28T21:00:27Z 2009-01-28T21:00:27Z 1995 1995-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3976 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 4223549 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description To date, there is very little information about the early stages of bilingual language acquisition, and the information available is largely based on diary and anecdotal reports. In this thesis research the productions of one infant A, (1;9) learning English and Norwegian were analysed to provide information about the phonological system(s) acquired by a bilingual infant. Two issues where addressed; (1) whether an infant simultaneously acquiring two languages uses a single phonetic inventory or two separate systems, and (2) the effect a bilingual environment has on phonological acquisition. Speech productions were collected via audio recordings during free play, parental diary records and the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Infants f1 989). All data were used to analyse the infant's lexicon. Transcriptions of the recorded data were compared across language environments and target languages in terms of phonetic inventories, syllabic inventories and substitution patterns. At the lexical level, A took the language of the listener into account in that he used a higher proportion of English words in the English environment and a higher percentage of Norwegian words in the Norwegian environment. He did not differentiate phonetic production. A used a single phonetic inventory in his productions of English and Norwegian words. A crosslanguage influence was noted in his system, as it contained both English and Norwegian segments, such as [w], which is part of the English (but not the Norwegian) system, and [0], which occurs in Norwegian, but not English. === Medicine, Faculty of === Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of === Graduate
author Lancaster, Paige Elizabeth
spellingShingle Lancaster, Paige Elizabeth
One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
author_facet Lancaster, Paige Elizabeth
author_sort Lancaster, Paige Elizabeth
title One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
title_short One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
title_full One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
title_fullStr One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
title_full_unstemmed One sound system or two? : Evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
title_sort one sound system or two? : evidence from one infant learning english and norwegian
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3976
work_keys_str_mv AT lancasterpaigeelizabeth onesoundsystemortwoevidencefromoneinfantlearningenglishandnorwegian
_version_ 1718586654475681792