Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development
The directive for "action" to sustain the quality of human life parallels "action research" in education to improve the quality of learning experiences in schools. The purpose of the study was to provide insight and understanding into the features of a team of intermediat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3967 |
id |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-3967 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-39672018-01-05T17:31:43Z Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development Arndt, Kerrylou Richardson The directive for "action" to sustain the quality of human life parallels "action research" in education to improve the quality of learning experiences in schools. The purpose of the study was to provide insight and understanding into the features of a team of intermediate teachers interacting in the development of a school-based curriculum project, the Winter Studies Program, in support of environmental education. The case study is an analysis of teacher discourse. It had the aims of: one, illuminating the dynamic features of dialogue that characterized teacher interactions and the processes of change in curriculum development; two, examining the support system and organizational structures that enabled change; and three, reflecting on collaborative action research as a process for professional development. Within a framework of systematic inquiry, data collection included video and audio recordings of teacher team meetings, fieldnotes, and reflection journals. The findings suggest that teacher discourse is characterized by three dynamic features: commonality of understanding of praxis, narratives of experience, and tension. In the establishment of a Professional Support Group teachers interact collaboratively to develop curriculum and in so doing, develop professionally. A support system, inclusive of organizational structures, creates opportunities for change. The study concludes that action research empowers individuals, through reflective inquiry, to change their praxis or the structures that influence their praxis. Education, Faculty of Curriculum and Pedagogy (EDCP), Department of Graduate 2009-01-28T17:41:49Z 2009-01-28T17:41:49Z 1995 1995-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3967 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 9077889 bytes application/pdf |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
The directive for "action" to sustain the quality of human
life parallels "action research" in education to improve the
quality of learning experiences in schools. The purpose of the
study was to provide insight and understanding into the features
of a team of intermediate teachers interacting in the development
of a school-based curriculum project, the Winter Studies Program,
in support of environmental education.
The case study is an analysis of teacher discourse. It had
the aims of: one, illuminating the dynamic features of dialogue
that characterized teacher interactions and the processes of
change in curriculum development; two, examining the support
system and organizational structures that enabled change; and
three, reflecting on collaborative action research as a process
for professional development. Within a framework of systematic
inquiry, data collection included video and audio recordings of
teacher team meetings, fieldnotes, and reflection journals.
The findings suggest that teacher discourse is characterized
by three dynamic features: commonality of understanding of praxis,
narratives of experience, and tension. In the establishment of a
Professional Support Group teachers interact collaboratively to
develop curriculum and in so doing, develop professionally. A
support system, inclusive of organizational structures, creates
opportunities for change. The study concludes that action research
empowers individuals, through reflective inquiry, to change their
praxis or the structures that influence their praxis. === Education, Faculty of === Curriculum and Pedagogy (EDCP), Department of === Graduate |
author |
Arndt, Kerrylou Richardson |
spellingShingle |
Arndt, Kerrylou Richardson Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
author_facet |
Arndt, Kerrylou Richardson |
author_sort |
Arndt, Kerrylou Richardson |
title |
Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
title_short |
Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
title_full |
Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
title_fullStr |
Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
title_sort |
teacher discourse in collaborative action research : a case study of professional and curriculum development |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3967 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arndtkerrylourichardson teacherdiscourseincollaborativeactionresearchacasestudyofprofessionalandcurriculumdevelopment |
_version_ |
1718586651240824832 |