Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can

In British Columbia (BC) foresters registered with the Association of BC Forest Professionals (ABCFP) have been given the exclusive right to practise professional forestry. As with all professions there is an expectation that Registered Professional Foresters (RPFs) conduct their activities in an et...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baumber, Stephen William
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3849
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-3849
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-38492018-01-05T17:23:13Z Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can Baumber, Stephen William Registered Professional Forester British Columbia Professional Ethics Ethical Dilemmas Forestery Discretion Ethical Agency Interviews Ronald Dworkin Association of BC Forest Professionals In British Columbia (BC) foresters registered with the Association of BC Forest Professionals (ABCFP) have been given the exclusive right to practise professional forestry. As with all professions there is an expectation that Registered Professional Foresters (RPFs) conduct their activities in an ethical manner and are therefore obligated to act as an ethical agent on behalf of society regarding forest resources. If a certain level of ethical agency is desired of professionals we need to understand whether or not an RPF possesses the ability (defined as their discretion) to sufficiently fulfil this responsibility. Rule-based and principle-based standards of forest management, an RPF’s scope of practice, and the socio-political framework of public forest management in BC all come together to define an RPF’s discretionary context, which sets the limits to an RPF’s discretion. This context is highly idiosyncratic to a specific situation or decision and this makes the RPF’s discretion similarly idiosyncratic. This suggests that an RPF should not be accountable for a standard of ethical agency that does not reflect the context-dependent level of discretion they possess. Fifteen interviews of RPFs were conducted for this study to discuss their approach to ethical decision making. The analysis of the interviews revealed 12 major themes, several of which appear to be highly idiosyncratic to the situations described by the participants. The way these themes were perceived by the participants revealed the differences in the discretionary context of their situations. Several aspects of ethical deliberation emerged from the data that appear to be particular to broad employer categories, including delegated decision-making (government), economic and forest health considerations (industry), and the tension between personal and professional values (consultants). Forestry, Faculty of Graduate 2009-01-23T20:06:55Z 2009-01-23T20:06:55Z 2009 2009-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3849 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 584144 bytes application/pdf University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Registered Professional Forester British Columbia
Professional Ethics
Ethical Dilemmas
Forestery
Discretion
Ethical Agency
Interviews
Ronald Dworkin
Association of BC Forest Professionals
spellingShingle Registered Professional Forester British Columbia
Professional Ethics
Ethical Dilemmas
Forestery
Discretion
Ethical Agency
Interviews
Ronald Dworkin
Association of BC Forest Professionals
Baumber, Stephen William
Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can
description In British Columbia (BC) foresters registered with the Association of BC Forest Professionals (ABCFP) have been given the exclusive right to practise professional forestry. As with all professions there is an expectation that Registered Professional Foresters (RPFs) conduct their activities in an ethical manner and are therefore obligated to act as an ethical agent on behalf of society regarding forest resources. If a certain level of ethical agency is desired of professionals we need to understand whether or not an RPF possesses the ability (defined as their discretion) to sufficiently fulfil this responsibility. Rule-based and principle-based standards of forest management, an RPF’s scope of practice, and the socio-political framework of public forest management in BC all come together to define an RPF’s discretionary context, which sets the limits to an RPF’s discretion. This context is highly idiosyncratic to a specific situation or decision and this makes the RPF’s discretion similarly idiosyncratic. This suggests that an RPF should not be accountable for a standard of ethical agency that does not reflect the context-dependent level of discretion they possess. Fifteen interviews of RPFs were conducted for this study to discuss their approach to ethical decision making. The analysis of the interviews revealed 12 major themes, several of which appear to be highly idiosyncratic to the situations described by the participants. The way these themes were perceived by the participants revealed the differences in the discretionary context of their situations. Several aspects of ethical deliberation emerged from the data that appear to be particular to broad employer categories, including delegated decision-making (government), economic and forest health considerations (industry), and the tension between personal and professional values (consultants). === Forestry, Faculty of === Graduate
author Baumber, Stephen William
author_facet Baumber, Stephen William
author_sort Baumber, Stephen William
title Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can
title_short Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can
title_full Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can
title_fullStr Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can
title_full_unstemmed Exploring discretion and ethical agency of BC professional foresters : the space between ought and can
title_sort exploring discretion and ethical agency of bc professional foresters : the space between ought and can
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3849
work_keys_str_mv AT baumberstephenwilliam exploringdiscretionandethicalagencyofbcprofessionalforestersthespacebetweenoughtandcan
_version_ 1718581878218293248