Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning

How do infants initially determine whether a novel object word labels a specific individual (e.g. Madonna) or an instance of a category (e.g., a person)? The research in this dissertation tested the hypothesis that infants assume words for objects from some categories (e.g., people) label individual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leung, Dilys Hay Lok
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/33957
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-33957
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-339572018-01-05T17:24:58Z Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning Leung, Dilys Hay Lok How do infants initially determine whether a novel object word labels a specific individual (e.g. Madonna) or an instance of a category (e.g., a person)? The research in this dissertation tested the hypothesis that infants assume words for objects from some categories (e.g., people) label individuals (are proper names) but words for objects from other categories (e.g., artifacts) label instances of the category (are count nouns). This assumption could help infants to identify proper names and count nouns in their language, and thereby facilitate the learning of the linguistic proper name/count noun distinction. In a preferential looking task, 16- and 17-month-olds heard a novel word for a target person (a face) or artifact, and their willingness to generalize the word to a non-target object was assessed. In Experiment 1, infants restricted the word to the target object when it was paired with a non-target object from a different category, providing evidence that infants can learn a novel word for the target object in this task. In Experiment 2, infants restricted the word to the target object when both the target and non-target objects were people, but not when they were artifacts from the same category. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that infants interpret words for people as proper names and words for artifacts as count nouns. In Experiment 3, infants were asked to find the referent of a second novel label in a task identical to Experiment 2. Here, infants restricted their looking to the non-target object when the objects were people, but not when they were artifacts. In Experiment 4, infants did not restrict the novel label to a person (a face) when it was inverted. This result provides evidence that infants’ tendency in Experiment 2 to restrict a label to a particular person was not simply due to the greater perceptual complexity of faces. Together, the findings reveal that infants interpret words for people and words for artifacts differently, raising the possibility that object category distinctions help infants to identify proper names and count nouns in their language and to learn how they are expressed linguistically. Arts, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Graduate 2011-04-26T15:11:03Z 2011-04-26T15:11:03Z 2011 2011-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/33957 eng Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description How do infants initially determine whether a novel object word labels a specific individual (e.g. Madonna) or an instance of a category (e.g., a person)? The research in this dissertation tested the hypothesis that infants assume words for objects from some categories (e.g., people) label individuals (are proper names) but words for objects from other categories (e.g., artifacts) label instances of the category (are count nouns). This assumption could help infants to identify proper names and count nouns in their language, and thereby facilitate the learning of the linguistic proper name/count noun distinction. In a preferential looking task, 16- and 17-month-olds heard a novel word for a target person (a face) or artifact, and their willingness to generalize the word to a non-target object was assessed. In Experiment 1, infants restricted the word to the target object when it was paired with a non-target object from a different category, providing evidence that infants can learn a novel word for the target object in this task. In Experiment 2, infants restricted the word to the target object when both the target and non-target objects were people, but not when they were artifacts from the same category. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that infants interpret words for people as proper names and words for artifacts as count nouns. In Experiment 3, infants were asked to find the referent of a second novel label in a task identical to Experiment 2. Here, infants restricted their looking to the non-target object when the objects were people, but not when they were artifacts. In Experiment 4, infants did not restrict the novel label to a person (a face) when it was inverted. This result provides evidence that infants’ tendency in Experiment 2 to restrict a label to a particular person was not simply due to the greater perceptual complexity of faces. Together, the findings reveal that infants interpret words for people and words for artifacts differently, raising the possibility that object category distinctions help infants to identify proper names and count nouns in their language and to learn how they are expressed linguistically. === Arts, Faculty of === Psychology, Department of === Graduate
author Leung, Dilys Hay Lok
spellingShingle Leung, Dilys Hay Lok
Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
author_facet Leung, Dilys Hay Lok
author_sort Leung, Dilys Hay Lok
title Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
title_short Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
title_full Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
title_fullStr Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
title_full_unstemmed Infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
title_sort infants' use of object category distinctions in word learning
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/33957
work_keys_str_mv AT leungdilyshaylok infantsuseofobjectcategorydistinctionsinwordlearning
_version_ 1718582851265363968