Free recall: organization and long-term memory
Free recall was examined In order to (1) examine the differences between the clustering of items from a list with an a priori structure and the subjective organization from a list of unrelated words and to (2) describe organizational processes in terms of theoretical constructs. Three sections of ex...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of British Columbia
2011
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/32868 |
Summary: | Free recall was examined In order to (1) examine the differences between the clustering of items from a list with an a priori structure and the subjective organization from a list of unrelated words and to (2) describe organizational processes in terms of theoretical constructs. Three sections of experiments found: (1) that two manipulations of organization
of lists of unrelated words had asymmetric effects on recognition
and recall performance; (2) that order of output and recall performance from two lists of unrelated words was predicted by similarity judgments data; and (3) that order of output from two specially-constructed
lists was described by a hierarchical arrangement of categories. The data were interpreted as showing three commonalities between the clustering of items from a list with an a priori structure and the subjective
organization from a list of unrelated words. These were: (1) asymmetric effects on recognition and recall can be produced by manipulations
of both categorized and unrelated lists;(2) order of output can be predicted by similarity judgments data for both categorized and unrelated lists; and (3) free recall performance can be predicted by conformity to category structures for both categorized and unrelated lists. An informal model of free recall was proposed. The model had the following properties which were abstracted from the experiments:
(1) the internal structure of organization was described as hierarchical;
(2) the processing which results in this structure was based on similarities
between items; and (3) the output was described as representing different
processes dependent upon whether recall or recognition tests
are used. === Arts, Faculty of === Psychology, Department of === Graduate |
---|