Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation

The control of the video-camera plays an important factor in the overall efficiency of a teleoperator system. A computer-based video-camera control has been designed to compare and evaluate four different modes of control. A situation where an operator does not have a free hand for the control of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frenette, Réal
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25093
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-25093
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-250932018-01-05T17:42:57Z Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation Frenette, Réal Robotics Remote control The control of the video-camera plays an important factor in the overall efficiency of a teleoperator system. A computer-based video-camera control has been designed to compare and evaluate four different modes of control. A situation where an operator does not have a free hand for the control of the video-camera has been selected: such a situation can be found in subsea applications where the operator is required to steer a submarine and to manipulate a robot arm. The four modes are: • manual control mode : The operator's right hand is used to control both the robot arm and the camera system. The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is performed by pressing push buttons. • automatic tracking mode : The camera (with close-up lens) automatically tracks the end effector of the slave arm, without direction from the operator. • voice-operated mode : The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is accomplished by spoken commands. • fixed-camera-position mode : A wide angle lens is used in this mode. The camera constantly remains in a straight ahead position and no controls are required. A tracking task and a pick-and-drop task were performed during the experiments. Measures of speed and accuracy were taken and analyzed; subjective remarks were also gathered. Results showed significant differences between the modes. Specifically, automatic tracking mode and voice-operated mode were found to offer the best ergonomic environment for the operator in terms of speed-accuracy tradeoff. Applied Science, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Graduate 2010-05-27T02:13:16Z 2010-05-27T02:13:16Z 1985 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25093 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Robotics
Remote control
spellingShingle Robotics
Remote control
Frenette, Réal
Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
description The control of the video-camera plays an important factor in the overall efficiency of a teleoperator system. A computer-based video-camera control has been designed to compare and evaluate four different modes of control. A situation where an operator does not have a free hand for the control of the video-camera has been selected: such a situation can be found in subsea applications where the operator is required to steer a submarine and to manipulate a robot arm. The four modes are: • manual control mode : The operator's right hand is used to control both the robot arm and the camera system. The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is performed by pressing push buttons. • automatic tracking mode : The camera (with close-up lens) automatically tracks the end effector of the slave arm, without direction from the operator. • voice-operated mode : The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is accomplished by spoken commands. • fixed-camera-position mode : A wide angle lens is used in this mode. The camera constantly remains in a straight ahead position and no controls are required. A tracking task and a pick-and-drop task were performed during the experiments. Measures of speed and accuracy were taken and analyzed; subjective remarks were also gathered. Results showed significant differences between the modes. Specifically, automatic tracking mode and voice-operated mode were found to offer the best ergonomic environment for the operator in terms of speed-accuracy tradeoff. === Applied Science, Faculty of === Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of === Graduate
author Frenette, Réal
author_facet Frenette, Réal
author_sort Frenette, Réal
title Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
title_short Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
title_full Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
title_fullStr Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
title_sort evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25093
work_keys_str_mv AT frenettereal evaluationofvideocameracontrolsforremotemanipulation
_version_ 1718592704626032640