Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation
The control of the video-camera plays an important factor in the overall efficiency of a teleoperator system. A computer-based video-camera control has been designed to compare and evaluate four different modes of control. A situation where an operator does not have a free hand for the control of th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of British Columbia
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25093 |
id |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-25093 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-250932018-01-05T17:42:57Z Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation Frenette, Réal Robotics Remote control The control of the video-camera plays an important factor in the overall efficiency of a teleoperator system. A computer-based video-camera control has been designed to compare and evaluate four different modes of control. A situation where an operator does not have a free hand for the control of the video-camera has been selected: such a situation can be found in subsea applications where the operator is required to steer a submarine and to manipulate a robot arm. The four modes are: • manual control mode : The operator's right hand is used to control both the robot arm and the camera system. The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is performed by pressing push buttons. • automatic tracking mode : The camera (with close-up lens) automatically tracks the end effector of the slave arm, without direction from the operator. • voice-operated mode : The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is accomplished by spoken commands. • fixed-camera-position mode : A wide angle lens is used in this mode. The camera constantly remains in a straight ahead position and no controls are required. A tracking task and a pick-and-drop task were performed during the experiments. Measures of speed and accuracy were taken and analyzed; subjective remarks were also gathered. Results showed significant differences between the modes. Specifically, automatic tracking mode and voice-operated mode were found to offer the best ergonomic environment for the operator in terms of speed-accuracy tradeoff. Applied Science, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Graduate 2010-05-27T02:13:16Z 2010-05-27T02:13:16Z 1985 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25093 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. University of British Columbia |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Robotics Remote control |
spellingShingle |
Robotics Remote control Frenette, Réal Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
description |
The control of the video-camera plays an important factor in the overall efficiency of a teleoperator system. A computer-based video-camera control has been designed to compare and evaluate four different modes of control. A situation where an operator does not have a free hand for the control of the video-camera has been selected: such a situation can be found in subsea applications where the operator is required to steer a submarine and to manipulate a robot arm.
The four modes are:
• manual control mode : The operator's right hand is used to control both the robot arm and the camera system. The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is performed by pressing push buttons.
• automatic tracking mode : The camera (with close-up lens) automatically tracks the end effector of the slave arm, without direction from the operator.
• voice-operated mode : The orientation of the camera (with close-up lens) is accomplished by spoken commands.
• fixed-camera-position mode : A wide angle lens is used in this mode. The camera constantly remains in a straight ahead position and no controls are required.
A tracking task and a pick-and-drop task were performed during the experiments. Measures of speed and accuracy were taken and analyzed; subjective remarks were also gathered.
Results showed significant differences between the modes. Specifically, automatic tracking mode and voice-operated mode were found to offer the best ergonomic environment for the operator in terms of speed-accuracy tradeoff. === Applied Science, Faculty of === Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of === Graduate |
author |
Frenette, Réal |
author_facet |
Frenette, Réal |
author_sort |
Frenette, Réal |
title |
Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
title_short |
Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
title_full |
Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
title_sort |
evaluation of video-camera controls for remote manipulation |
publisher |
University of British Columbia |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25093 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT frenettereal evaluationofvideocameracontrolsforremotemanipulation |
_version_ |
1718592704626032640 |