A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency
A suite of three underlying rainfall-runoff modeling techniques is applied to two data sets and the results used to compare model efficiencies for selected events. Linear regression, unit hydrograph, and quasi-physically based models make up the modeling suite. The two data sets come from a 7.2 KM s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/23871 |
id |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-23871 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-238712018-01-05T17:42:18Z A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency Loague, Keith Michael A suite of three underlying rainfall-runoff modeling techniques is applied to two data sets and the results used to compare model efficiencies for selected events. Linear regression, unit hydrograph, and quasi-physically based models make up the modeling suite. The two data sets come from a 7.2 KM subwatershed (MCW) near Klingerstown, Pennsylvania and a 0.096 KM2 subwatershed (R-5) near Chickasha, Oklahoma.-Individual model efficiencies are determined on the basis of a sums of squares criterion. These efficiencies are surprisingly poor. Results indicate that the most informative independent linear regression variables for MCW and R-5 are volume of rainfall and average rainfall intensity respectively. There is a general improvement in correlation coefficients and regression model efficiencies for both MCW and R-5 with increases in the number of selected events. The unit hydrograph and quasi-physically based models exhibited predictive prowess only for the R-5 events. The unit hydrograph technique is found to be strongly dependent upon an accurate estimate of spatially-variable excess rainfall. The efficiency of the physically-based, deterministic, distributed model was found to deteriorate drastically with increases in basin size due to the lumping of spatially-variable soil hydraulic properties. Based on this work a definitively superior rainfall-runoff modeling technique is not suggested. Limitations of each of the three models and the efficiency criterion used for their evaluation are discussed. This work provides the foundation for a subsequent investigation to be carried out by the author, to determine if space-time tradeoffs exist across data sets of various rainfall-runoff modeling techniques. Future research will focus on the concept of data-worth and the question of model choice. Science, Faculty of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Graduate 2010-04-19T22:29:35Z 2010-04-19T22:29:35Z 1982 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/23871 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
A suite of three underlying rainfall-runoff modeling techniques is applied to two data sets and the results used to compare model efficiencies for selected events. Linear regression, unit hydrograph, and quasi-physically based models make up the modeling suite. The two data sets come from a 7.2 KM subwatershed (MCW) near Klingerstown, Pennsylvania and a 0.096 KM2 subwatershed (R-5) near Chickasha, Oklahoma.-Individual model efficiencies are determined on the basis of a sums of squares criterion. These efficiencies are surprisingly poor. Results indicate that the most informative independent linear regression variables for MCW and R-5 are volume of rainfall and average rainfall intensity respectively. There is a general improvement in correlation coefficients and regression model efficiencies for both MCW and R-5 with increases in the number of selected events. The unit hydrograph and quasi-physically based models exhibited predictive prowess only for the R-5 events. The unit hydrograph technique is found to be strongly dependent upon an accurate estimate of spatially-variable excess rainfall. The efficiency of the physically-based, deterministic, distributed model was found to deteriorate drastically with increases in basin size due to the lumping of spatially-variable soil hydraulic properties. Based on this work a definitively superior rainfall-runoff modeling technique is not suggested. Limitations of each of the three models and the efficiency criterion used for their evaluation are discussed. This work provides the foundation for a subsequent investigation to be carried out by the author, to determine if space-time tradeoffs exist across data sets of various rainfall-runoff modeling techniques. Future research will focus on the concept of data-worth and the question of model choice. === Science, Faculty of === Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of === Graduate |
author |
Loague, Keith Michael |
spellingShingle |
Loague, Keith Michael A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
author_facet |
Loague, Keith Michael |
author_sort |
Loague, Keith Michael |
title |
A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
title_short |
A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
title_full |
A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
title_sort |
comparison of techniques used in rainfall-runoff models : model efficiency |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/23871 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT loaguekeithmichael acomparisonoftechniquesusedinrainfallrunoffmodelsmodelefficiency AT loaguekeithmichael comparisonoftechniquesusedinrainfallrunoffmodelsmodelefficiency |
_version_ |
1718592377047744512 |