The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs

This thesis examines the hypothesis that government housing policies - in particular rehabilitation policies - create positive spillover effects (externalities) to surrounding homes, buildings, and property values in general. These effects are examined for two reasons: (a)There is a large body of li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tucker, Earl Nathan
Language:English
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/23556
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-23556
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-235562018-01-05T17:42:15Z The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs Tucker, Earl Nathan This thesis examines the hypothesis that government housing policies - in particular rehabilitation policies - create positive spillover effects (externalities) to surrounding homes, buildings, and property values in general. These effects are examined for two reasons: (a)There is a large body of literature focussing on externalities created by government housing policies, but very little of this theory has been tested empirically; (b) The recent implementation of rehabilitation policies have been based in part on the expectation that the policies create positive neighborhood effects. In this study, an empirical analysis is performed on one rehabilitation program — the Canadian Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP). The program is analyzed via multivariate regression analysis to determine if any externalities are created by this housing policy. The determination of externalities is important in understanding the factors affecting neighborhood change. This study investigates the relationship between externalities and expectations and discusses how these factors can have large impacts on reinvestment patterns which create positive neighborhood change. The empirical findings of this study indicate that there are no externalities created by the RRAP program. This research suggests that such programs be implemented on the basis of the individual benefits for the recipient. The findings imply that similar rehabilitation programs will not create positive externalities or expectations and, hence, cannot be factors affecting neighborhood change. As a result, policy analysts should conclude that programs similar to RRAP should not be implemented solely on the basis that there are indirect external benefits to the neighborhood. Business, Sauder School of Graduate 2010-04-15T00:09:18Z 2010-04-15T00:09:18Z 1983 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/23556 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description This thesis examines the hypothesis that government housing policies - in particular rehabilitation policies - create positive spillover effects (externalities) to surrounding homes, buildings, and property values in general. These effects are examined for two reasons: (a)There is a large body of literature focussing on externalities created by government housing policies, but very little of this theory has been tested empirically; (b) The recent implementation of rehabilitation policies have been based in part on the expectation that the policies create positive neighborhood effects. In this study, an empirical analysis is performed on one rehabilitation program — the Canadian Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP). The program is analyzed via multivariate regression analysis to determine if any externalities are created by this housing policy. The determination of externalities is important in understanding the factors affecting neighborhood change. This study investigates the relationship between externalities and expectations and discusses how these factors can have large impacts on reinvestment patterns which create positive neighborhood change. The empirical findings of this study indicate that there are no externalities created by the RRAP program. This research suggests that such programs be implemented on the basis of the individual benefits for the recipient. The findings imply that similar rehabilitation programs will not create positive externalities or expectations and, hence, cannot be factors affecting neighborhood change. As a result, policy analysts should conclude that programs similar to RRAP should not be implemented solely on the basis that there are indirect external benefits to the neighborhood. === Business, Sauder School of === Graduate
author Tucker, Earl Nathan
spellingShingle Tucker, Earl Nathan
The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
author_facet Tucker, Earl Nathan
author_sort Tucker, Earl Nathan
title The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
title_short The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
title_full The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
title_fullStr The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
title_full_unstemmed The external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
title_sort external benefits of government subsidized rehabilitation programs
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/23556
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerearlnathan theexternalbenefitsofgovernmentsubsidizedrehabilitationprograms
AT tuckerearlnathan externalbenefitsofgovernmentsubsidizedrehabilitationprograms
_version_ 1718592315722825728