The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages

The Labour Code of B.C. embodies a policy to promote collective bargaining by reducing legalism and emphasizing voluntarism and mutual accommodation. The Labour Relations Board's approach to illegal work stoppages supports this policy by encouraging settlements with informal mediation rather th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathes, Raymond Walter
Language:English
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/22886
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-22886
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-228862018-01-05T17:41:56Z The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages Mathes, Raymond Walter The Labour Code of B.C. embodies a policy to promote collective bargaining by reducing legalism and emphasizing voluntarism and mutual accommodation. The Labour Relations Board's approach to illegal work stoppages supports this policy by encouraging settlements with informal mediation rather than proceeding to a formal hearing and adjudication. The Board's approach is based on understanding labour disputes as symptoms of underlying conflict between parties in a collective bargaining relationship. This is a significant departure from the traditional remedies used by the courts for enforcing statutory provisions concerning illegal work stoppages. The purpose of this thesis was to assess the Board's performance in handling illegal work stoppages. Thirty-one management representatives and twenty-eight union representatives who experienced the Board's approach were interviewed Their perceptions were used to assess the Board's performance The Board's approach is a successful alternative to the courts and supports the intent of the Labour Code. The majority of management representatives indicated, however, that the Board's approach works to the advantage of. unions because it attempts to mediate too often rather than issue an order. They felt unions sometimes manipulate the Board's procedures to obtain concessions during illegal work stoppage Therefore, the Board needs to exercise more discretion as when to mediate and when to convene formal hearings. The Board responds speedily enough to complaints, successfully determines underlying causes in disputes and its mediative role is not impeded by partisanship of Boardmembers. Business, Sauder School of Graduate 2010-03-29T19:27:09Z 2010-03-29T19:27:09Z 1982 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/22886 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description The Labour Code of B.C. embodies a policy to promote collective bargaining by reducing legalism and emphasizing voluntarism and mutual accommodation. The Labour Relations Board's approach to illegal work stoppages supports this policy by encouraging settlements with informal mediation rather than proceeding to a formal hearing and adjudication. The Board's approach is based on understanding labour disputes as symptoms of underlying conflict between parties in a collective bargaining relationship. This is a significant departure from the traditional remedies used by the courts for enforcing statutory provisions concerning illegal work stoppages. The purpose of this thesis was to assess the Board's performance in handling illegal work stoppages. Thirty-one management representatives and twenty-eight union representatives who experienced the Board's approach were interviewed Their perceptions were used to assess the Board's performance The Board's approach is a successful alternative to the courts and supports the intent of the Labour Code. The majority of management representatives indicated, however, that the Board's approach works to the advantage of. unions because it attempts to mediate too often rather than issue an order. They felt unions sometimes manipulate the Board's procedures to obtain concessions during illegal work stoppage Therefore, the Board needs to exercise more discretion as when to mediate and when to convene formal hearings. The Board responds speedily enough to complaints, successfully determines underlying causes in disputes and its mediative role is not impeded by partisanship of Boardmembers. === Business, Sauder School of === Graduate
author Mathes, Raymond Walter
spellingShingle Mathes, Raymond Walter
The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
author_facet Mathes, Raymond Walter
author_sort Mathes, Raymond Walter
title The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
title_short The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
title_full The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
title_fullStr The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
title_full_unstemmed The mediative role of the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
title_sort mediative role of the labour relations board of british columbia in disputes involving illegal work stoppages
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/22886
work_keys_str_mv AT mathesraymondwalter themediativeroleofthelabourrelationsboardofbritishcolumbiaindisputesinvolvingillegalworkstoppages
AT mathesraymondwalter mediativeroleofthelabourrelationsboardofbritishcolumbiaindisputesinvolvingillegalworkstoppages
_version_ 1718592151550427136