A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics

This study examines visual elements in two-dimensional art imagery, and compares and contrasts traditional art images with computer graphics. The formalist model of aesthetic response is used as a lens to examine "elements” and "principles" in what has been called the "language o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, Mia
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2177
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-2177
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-21772018-01-05T17:30:31Z A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics Johnson, Mia This study examines visual elements in two-dimensional art imagery, and compares and contrasts traditional art images with computer graphics. The formalist model of aesthetic response is used as a lens to examine "elements” and "principles" in what has been called the "language of art". Formalist orientations to art education and computer graphics are analyzed through a literature search, a domain analysis, and ethnographic data. This study employs qualitative research methodology. Data is presented in a comparative taxonomy of elements and principles in art education and computer graphics, and a componential analysis of the visual structure of two-dimensional images. The findings demonstrate that formalist terms and concepts are not explicit enough to describe computer graphics. The formalist tradition in art education must be expanded to include new terminology and concepts about making and responding to art. Education, Faculty of Curriculum and Pedagogy (EDCP), Department of Graduate 2008-09-17T18:20:44Z 2008-09-17T18:20:44Z 1993 1993-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2177 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 10877179 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description This study examines visual elements in two-dimensional art imagery, and compares and contrasts traditional art images with computer graphics. The formalist model of aesthetic response is used as a lens to examine "elements” and "principles" in what has been called the "language of art". Formalist orientations to art education and computer graphics are analyzed through a literature search, a domain analysis, and ethnographic data. This study employs qualitative research methodology. Data is presented in a comparative taxonomy of elements and principles in art education and computer graphics, and a componential analysis of the visual structure of two-dimensional images. The findings demonstrate that formalist terms and concepts are not explicit enough to describe computer graphics. The formalist tradition in art education must be expanded to include new terminology and concepts about making and responding to art. === Education, Faculty of === Curriculum and Pedagogy (EDCP), Department of === Graduate
author Johnson, Mia
spellingShingle Johnson, Mia
A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
author_facet Johnson, Mia
author_sort Johnson, Mia
title A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
title_short A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
title_full A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
title_fullStr A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
title_sort comparative study of visual elements in traditional art images and computer graphics
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2177
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmia acomparativestudyofvisualelementsintraditionalartimagesandcomputergraphics
AT johnsonmia comparativestudyofvisualelementsintraditionalartimagesandcomputergraphics
_version_ 1718586272343130112