Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice

The social context in the hospital setting is fraught with competing and contradictory versions about who nurses are and what they do. Using a sociocultural framework, this thesis provides an analysis of historical and contemporary texts related to hospital-based nursing, and argues that many themes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Macfarlane, Kim
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1923
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-1923
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-19232018-01-05T17:30:32Z Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice Macfarlane, Kim The social context in the hospital setting is fraught with competing and contradictory versions about who nurses are and what they do. Using a sociocultural framework, this thesis provides an analysis of historical and contemporary texts related to hospital-based nursing, and argues that many themes operative in these "official versions" of practice have rendered the breath and complexity of nurses' everyday practices "in/visible." Given that "official versions" of nursing practice are reified in nurses' job descriptions, this research develops a necessarily partial response to the following question: What are nurses' ideas about their in/visible practice within a hospital setting? Nurses’ in/visible practice is, here, defined as the disparity between their "actual" practices, and the job description's "textual representations" of their practice (Smith, 1987 &1990). This investigation took place in an acute care hospital in British Columbia. Seven nurses comprised the primary research group. The research methods used to investigate nurses' in/visible practice included: career autobiographies, direct observation, journals, unstructured one-on-one interviews and concurrent group discussions. Data obtained from these methods underwent qualitative analysis, and both the researcher and the researched (nurses) jointly constructed thematic interpretations of nurses' in/visible practice. This particular analysis of nurses’ in/visible practice suggests that there are "profound" disparities between nurses’ actual practices, and those represented in their job description. Nurses appear to have resisted such textual representations and, in turn, have (re)invented complex theories of "thinking-in-practice," interwoven with an informal "learning with/in practice curriculum." Education, Faculty of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), Department of Graduate 2008-09-12T23:44:31Z 2008-09-12T23:44:31Z 1993 1993-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1923 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 6496750 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The social context in the hospital setting is fraught with competing and contradictory versions about who nurses are and what they do. Using a sociocultural framework, this thesis provides an analysis of historical and contemporary texts related to hospital-based nursing, and argues that many themes operative in these "official versions" of practice have rendered the breath and complexity of nurses' everyday practices "in/visible." Given that "official versions" of nursing practice are reified in nurses' job descriptions, this research develops a necessarily partial response to the following question: What are nurses' ideas about their in/visible practice within a hospital setting? Nurses’ in/visible practice is, here, defined as the disparity between their "actual" practices, and the job description's "textual representations" of their practice (Smith, 1987 &1990). This investigation took place in an acute care hospital in British Columbia. Seven nurses comprised the primary research group. The research methods used to investigate nurses' in/visible practice included: career autobiographies, direct observation, journals, unstructured one-on-one interviews and concurrent group discussions. Data obtained from these methods underwent qualitative analysis, and both the researcher and the researched (nurses) jointly constructed thematic interpretations of nurses' in/visible practice. This particular analysis of nurses’ in/visible practice suggests that there are "profound" disparities between nurses’ actual practices, and those represented in their job description. Nurses appear to have resisted such textual representations and, in turn, have (re)invented complex theories of "thinking-in-practice," interwoven with an informal "learning with/in practice curriculum." === Education, Faculty of === Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), Department of === Graduate
author Macfarlane, Kim
spellingShingle Macfarlane, Kim
Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
author_facet Macfarlane, Kim
author_sort Macfarlane, Kim
title Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
title_short Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
title_full Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
title_fullStr Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
title_full_unstemmed Exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
title_sort exploring historical and contemporary fragments of nurses’ invisible practice
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1923
work_keys_str_mv AT macfarlanekim exploringhistoricalandcontemporaryfragmentsofnursesinvisiblepractice
_version_ 1718586193833099264