Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity

Taking its cue from one of the oldest of the old philosophical discourses—the relationship of one's body, and all of its determinations, to selfhood—the program of research reported here explores possible age-graded shifts in how young people, ordinarily understand the identity "objects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phillips, Jesse
Language:English
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17742
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-17742
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-177422018-01-05T17:39:03Z Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity Phillips, Jesse Taking its cue from one of the oldest of the old philosophical discourses—the relationship of one's body, and all of its determinations, to selfhood—the program of research reported here explores possible age-graded shifts in how young people, ordinarily understand the identity "objects" in the face of change. Trading upon earlier work by Gelman, (2003), Atran (2002), and Keil (1989), as well as Piaget (1983), the study reported here is intended as a means of getting clear about what are taken to be the persistent features of "objects" belonging to three ontologically distinct categories— categories that are standardly referred to as "things of a natural kind," artifacts, and persons. What is particularly novel about this study effort is that target objects of these three distinct ontological sorts were presented (in story form), all in ways that emphasized their credentials as either a "Kind' of thing, or their status as individuals. More particularly, I undertook to measure age-graded changes in the way that a building sample of 50 adolescents differently conceptualize such notions of kind and individual identity. The findings indicate that when young people were presented with tasks that required them to make judgments about the nature of "individual" and "kind" identity, they proved to be quite insensitive to matters of categorical membership. Instead, they tended to essentialize when these "objects" were described as kinds of things, but were significantly less ready to reason essentialistically when the individual character of these same objects was emphasized. Arts, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Graduate 2010-01-08T01:56:02Z 2010-01-08T01:56:02Z 2006 2006-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17742 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Taking its cue from one of the oldest of the old philosophical discourses—the relationship of one's body, and all of its determinations, to selfhood—the program of research reported here explores possible age-graded shifts in how young people, ordinarily understand the identity "objects" in the face of change. Trading upon earlier work by Gelman, (2003), Atran (2002), and Keil (1989), as well as Piaget (1983), the study reported here is intended as a means of getting clear about what are taken to be the persistent features of "objects" belonging to three ontologically distinct categories— categories that are standardly referred to as "things of a natural kind," artifacts, and persons. What is particularly novel about this study effort is that target objects of these three distinct ontological sorts were presented (in story form), all in ways that emphasized their credentials as either a "Kind' of thing, or their status as individuals. More particularly, I undertook to measure age-graded changes in the way that a building sample of 50 adolescents differently conceptualize such notions of kind and individual identity. The findings indicate that when young people were presented with tasks that required them to make judgments about the nature of "individual" and "kind" identity, they proved to be quite insensitive to matters of categorical membership. Instead, they tended to essentialize when these "objects" were described as kinds of things, but were significantly less ready to reason essentialistically when the individual character of these same objects was emphasized. === Arts, Faculty of === Psychology, Department of === Graduate
author Phillips, Jesse
spellingShingle Phillips, Jesse
Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
author_facet Phillips, Jesse
author_sort Phillips, Jesse
title Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
title_short Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
title_full Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
title_fullStr Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
title_full_unstemmed Skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
title_sort skunks, puppets, and human beings : exploring young people’s understanding of individual and kind identity
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17742
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsjesse skunkspuppetsandhumanbeingsexploringyoungpeoplesunderstandingofindividualandkindidentity
_version_ 1718590624047824896