Slow cortical potential measures of amplification

With the advent of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs, it has become increasingly common for infants to be fit with hearing aids by six months of age. Due to the inability of infants to actively participate in the hearing aid fitting, there is a need for a reliable and objective measure o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marynewich, Susan Lindsay
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17698
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-17698
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-176982018-01-05T17:24:02Z Slow cortical potential measures of amplification Marynewich, Susan Lindsay With the advent of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs, it has become increasingly common for infants to be fit with hearing aids by six months of age. Due to the inability of infants to actively participate in the hearing aid fitting, there is a need for a reliable and objective measure of hearing aid validation in this population. Slow cortical potentials (SCP) are currently being marketed for the purpose of validating infant hearing aid fittings; however, there is a lack of evidence to support use of SCPs for this purpose. In the current thesis, two studies were carried out: Study A investigated N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in response to a 60-ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50 and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, DigitalB) with two gain settings (20- and 40-dB). Study B investigated the effects of hearing aid processing on acoustic measures of the stimuli, under the same conditions as Study A, with an additional 757-ms tonal stimulus (1000 Hz). Overall, it was predicted that N1-P2 amplitudes would be larger and N1 latencies shorter in the aided compared with unaided conditions; however, the results showed response amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to unaided across conditions. Additionally, N1 response latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from unaided N1 latencies; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed N1 peaks. Acoustic recording results obtained in Study B indicate that gain achieved by the hearing aids for both the short and long SCP stimuli was less than real-ear insertion gain measured with standard hearing aid test signals. The effect was more pronounced for the short stimulus. These results suggest that the typical stimuli used for SCP testing may be too brief for the processing time of hearing aids, especially those with digital processing. Medicine, Faculty of Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of Graduate 2010-01-07T22:07:35Z 2010-01-07T22:07:35Z 2010 2010-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17698 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description With the advent of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs, it has become increasingly common for infants to be fit with hearing aids by six months of age. Due to the inability of infants to actively participate in the hearing aid fitting, there is a need for a reliable and objective measure of hearing aid validation in this population. Slow cortical potentials (SCP) are currently being marketed for the purpose of validating infant hearing aid fittings; however, there is a lack of evidence to support use of SCPs for this purpose. In the current thesis, two studies were carried out: Study A investigated N1-P2 amplitudes and N1 latencies in response to a 60-ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50 and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, DigitalB) with two gain settings (20- and 40-dB). Study B investigated the effects of hearing aid processing on acoustic measures of the stimuli, under the same conditions as Study A, with an additional 757-ms tonal stimulus (1000 Hz). Overall, it was predicted that N1-P2 amplitudes would be larger and N1 latencies shorter in the aided compared with unaided conditions; however, the results showed response amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to unaided across conditions. Additionally, N1 response latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from unaided N1 latencies; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed N1 peaks. Acoustic recording results obtained in Study B indicate that gain achieved by the hearing aids for both the short and long SCP stimuli was less than real-ear insertion gain measured with standard hearing aid test signals. The effect was more pronounced for the short stimulus. These results suggest that the typical stimuli used for SCP testing may be too brief for the processing time of hearing aids, especially those with digital processing. === Medicine, Faculty of === Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of === Graduate
author Marynewich, Susan Lindsay
spellingShingle Marynewich, Susan Lindsay
Slow cortical potential measures of amplification
author_facet Marynewich, Susan Lindsay
author_sort Marynewich, Susan Lindsay
title Slow cortical potential measures of amplification
title_short Slow cortical potential measures of amplification
title_full Slow cortical potential measures of amplification
title_fullStr Slow cortical potential measures of amplification
title_full_unstemmed Slow cortical potential measures of amplification
title_sort slow cortical potential measures of amplification
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17698
work_keys_str_mv AT marynewichsusanlindsay slowcorticalpotentialmeasuresofamplification
_version_ 1718582321050812416