The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access

Research in the area of speech perception has shown that prosodic, or suprasegmental, information contributes to the recognition of spoken words. However, the significance of this contribution in English has been debated. Some researchers have argued that suprasegmental cues are not exploited much i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Macdonald, Suzanne Lynne
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/14172
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-14172
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-141722018-01-05T17:37:09Z The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access Macdonald, Suzanne Lynne Research in the area of speech perception has shown that prosodic, or suprasegmental, information contributes to the recognition of spoken words. However, the significance of this contribution in English has been debated. Some researchers have argued that suprasegmental cues are not exploited much in English because suprasegmental cues co-vary with segmental cues and, therefore, information at the suprasegmental level is redundant. In this study, it is argued that segmental and suprasegmental cues are only redundant in ideal listening situations. It is hypothesized that suprasegmental cues will make a significant contribution to word recognition under degraded listening conditions. Sixteen normal hearing young adults listened to 100 common nouns presented in a gating paradigm. The 100 words were presented in four conditions: intact segmental and suprasegmental cues, degraded segmental cues, degraded suprasegmental cues, and degraded segmental and suprasegmental cues. Participants were asked to identify the word being presented. Participants' responses were scored according to the isolation point and the accuracy of word identification. Results for both measures showed that participants were able to identify the word sooner and more accurately when both segmental and suprasegmental cues were intact than when either cue was degraded; furthermore, when either cue was intact word recognition was faster and more accurate than when both cues were degraded. These results supported the hypothesis that suprasegmental cues can contribute significantly to spoken word recognition in English. Medicine, Faculty of Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of Graduate 2009-10-24T18:54:16Z 2009-10-24T18:54:16Z 2003 2003-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/14172 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 4343188 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Research in the area of speech perception has shown that prosodic, or suprasegmental, information contributes to the recognition of spoken words. However, the significance of this contribution in English has been debated. Some researchers have argued that suprasegmental cues are not exploited much in English because suprasegmental cues co-vary with segmental cues and, therefore, information at the suprasegmental level is redundant. In this study, it is argued that segmental and suprasegmental cues are only redundant in ideal listening situations. It is hypothesized that suprasegmental cues will make a significant contribution to word recognition under degraded listening conditions. Sixteen normal hearing young adults listened to 100 common nouns presented in a gating paradigm. The 100 words were presented in four conditions: intact segmental and suprasegmental cues, degraded segmental cues, degraded suprasegmental cues, and degraded segmental and suprasegmental cues. Participants were asked to identify the word being presented. Participants' responses were scored according to the isolation point and the accuracy of word identification. Results for both measures showed that participants were able to identify the word sooner and more accurately when both segmental and suprasegmental cues were intact than when either cue was degraded; furthermore, when either cue was intact word recognition was faster and more accurate than when both cues were degraded. These results supported the hypothesis that suprasegmental cues can contribute significantly to spoken word recognition in English. === Medicine, Faculty of === Audiology and Speech Sciences, School of === Graduate
author Macdonald, Suzanne Lynne
spellingShingle Macdonald, Suzanne Lynne
The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
author_facet Macdonald, Suzanne Lynne
author_sort Macdonald, Suzanne Lynne
title The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
title_short The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
title_full The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
title_fullStr The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
title_full_unstemmed The role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
title_sort role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in lexical access
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/14172
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaldsuzannelynne theroleofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalcuesinlexicalaccess
AT macdonaldsuzannelynne roleofsegmentalandsuprasegmentalcuesinlexicalaccess
_version_ 1718589550170734592