Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity

Daily process methods are becoming increasingly common in both health and social science research. However, the issue of how these intensive self-monitoring procedures affect participants and the information provided has not been systematically studied. In the present study, I explored the issue of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bermbach, Nicole
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/13952
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-13952
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-139522018-01-05T17:37:02Z Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity Bermbach, Nicole Daily process methods are becoming increasingly common in both health and social science research. However, the issue of how these intensive self-monitoring procedures affect participants and the information provided has not been systematically studied. In the present study, I explored the issue of reactivity in a daily diary study of workplace stress and coping among female clerical workers (n = 74), and compared them to clerical workers who did not self-monitor (n = 101). Daily diary participants provided information on stressors, coping, and mood twice a day for 15 consecutive workdays (30 occasions). At the end of the recording period participants reported on the overall experience of daily self-monitoring as well as on whether daily self-monitoring affected their behavior and mood. Participants also completed measures of distress (anxiety and depression) and satisfaction (job and life) both before and after completing the daily diaries. Finally, the role of individual differences [negative affect (NA) and depressive symptomatology] in reactivity was also examined. Results of repeated measures MANOVAs suggested that twice daily self-monitoring of stress and coping does not have a significant impact on daily mood during recording. Nor was there evidence of short-term effects of daily self-monitoring on participants' satisfaction and distress. However, content analysis revealed that participants' perceived daily self-monitoring to have had an impact. Though there was no evidence that this perceived impact was related to NA or depressive symptomatology, trend analysis showed that level of NA was associated with differential trends in daily anxious and depressed mood. Possible explanations for findings are discussed. Education, Faculty of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), Department of Graduate 2009-10-17T21:28:14Z 2009-10-17T21:28:14Z 2003 2003-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/13952 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 6675724 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Daily process methods are becoming increasingly common in both health and social science research. However, the issue of how these intensive self-monitoring procedures affect participants and the information provided has not been systematically studied. In the present study, I explored the issue of reactivity in a daily diary study of workplace stress and coping among female clerical workers (n = 74), and compared them to clerical workers who did not self-monitor (n = 101). Daily diary participants provided information on stressors, coping, and mood twice a day for 15 consecutive workdays (30 occasions). At the end of the recording period participants reported on the overall experience of daily self-monitoring as well as on whether daily self-monitoring affected their behavior and mood. Participants also completed measures of distress (anxiety and depression) and satisfaction (job and life) both before and after completing the daily diaries. Finally, the role of individual differences [negative affect (NA) and depressive symptomatology] in reactivity was also examined. Results of repeated measures MANOVAs suggested that twice daily self-monitoring of stress and coping does not have a significant impact on daily mood during recording. Nor was there evidence of short-term effects of daily self-monitoring on participants' satisfaction and distress. However, content analysis revealed that participants' perceived daily self-monitoring to have had an impact. Though there was no evidence that this perceived impact was related to NA or depressive symptomatology, trend analysis showed that level of NA was associated with differential trends in daily anxious and depressed mood. Possible explanations for findings are discussed. === Education, Faculty of === Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), Department of === Graduate
author Bermbach, Nicole
spellingShingle Bermbach, Nicole
Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
author_facet Bermbach, Nicole
author_sort Bermbach, Nicole
title Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
title_short Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
title_full Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
title_fullStr Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
title_full_unstemmed Participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
title_sort participating in a daily diary study of stress and coping : an exploration of reactivity
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/13952
work_keys_str_mv AT bermbachnicole participatinginadailydiarystudyofstressandcopinganexplorationofreactivity
_version_ 1718589490385125376