The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems

The Ethic of Care began as a theory of moral development, but many have accepted it as if it were a normative moral theory, either alone or in conjunction with the Ethic of Justice. This project determines whether or not the Ethic of Care actually can constitute a comprehensive moral theory. I b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fisher, Johnna Elizabeth Ann
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/13683
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-13683
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-136832018-01-05T17:36:58Z The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems Fisher, Johnna Elizabeth Ann The Ethic of Care began as a theory of moral development, but many have accepted it as if it were a normative moral theory, either alone or in conjunction with the Ethic of Justice. This project determines whether or not the Ethic of Care actually can constitute a comprehensive moral theory. I begin with the history of the development of the Ethic of Care. I then examine the widely-held view that moral relations are freely-chosen contractual agreements occurring between rational equals in order to manage the problem of public competition of interests and to protect individual rights. I suggest that this view of morality, its associated moral theory, the Ethic of Justice, and its criterion of impartiality do not represent the totality of moral experience and they mandate unpalatable outcomes in some private moral situations. As a result, I contend that the impartiality requirement should not be a criterion for judging the adequacy of a theory governing personal (private) moral relations. I suggest a list of appropriate criteria and compare the Ethic of Care with the list in order to determine whether it can act as a theory governing this realm. I argue that the Ethic of Care is a theory of personal morality, that the Ethic of Justice is a theory of impersonal morality, and that the quest for a comprehensive moral theory that accounts for the totality of moral relations must integrate these two perspectives in a way that overcomes the problem of prioritization. Various integration options from the current philosophical literature are explained and rejected before I provide my own account of how the Ethic of Care and the Ethic of Justice can interact, together providing a comprehensive moral theory capable of guiding action for the entire range of moral relations. Arts, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Graduate 2009-10-07 2009-10-07 2001 2001-05 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/13683 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 13533941 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The Ethic of Care began as a theory of moral development, but many have accepted it as if it were a normative moral theory, either alone or in conjunction with the Ethic of Justice. This project determines whether or not the Ethic of Care actually can constitute a comprehensive moral theory. I begin with the history of the development of the Ethic of Care. I then examine the widely-held view that moral relations are freely-chosen contractual agreements occurring between rational equals in order to manage the problem of public competition of interests and to protect individual rights. I suggest that this view of morality, its associated moral theory, the Ethic of Justice, and its criterion of impartiality do not represent the totality of moral experience and they mandate unpalatable outcomes in some private moral situations. As a result, I contend that the impartiality requirement should not be a criterion for judging the adequacy of a theory governing personal (private) moral relations. I suggest a list of appropriate criteria and compare the Ethic of Care with the list in order to determine whether it can act as a theory governing this realm. I argue that the Ethic of Care is a theory of personal morality, that the Ethic of Justice is a theory of impersonal morality, and that the quest for a comprehensive moral theory that accounts for the totality of moral relations must integrate these two perspectives in a way that overcomes the problem of prioritization. Various integration options from the current philosophical literature are explained and rejected before I provide my own account of how the Ethic of Care and the Ethic of Justice can interact, together providing a comprehensive moral theory capable of guiding action for the entire range of moral relations. === Arts, Faculty of === Philosophy, Department of === Graduate
author Fisher, Johnna Elizabeth Ann
spellingShingle Fisher, Johnna Elizabeth Ann
The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
author_facet Fisher, Johnna Elizabeth Ann
author_sort Fisher, Johnna Elizabeth Ann
title The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
title_short The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
title_full The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
title_fullStr The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
title_full_unstemmed The 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
title_sort 'ethic of care' : subtitle its promise and its problems
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/13683
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherjohnnaelizabethann theethicofcaresubtitleitspromiseanditsproblems
AT fisherjohnnaelizabethann ethicofcaresubtitleitspromiseanditsproblems
_version_ 1718589429051817984