Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure

Study Design: Prospective test re-test study. Objectives: To examine the reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM) and discuss its clinical implications. Background: Review of the literature indicates the need for a client-centred wheelchair outcome measurement tool that mea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garden, Jennifer Anna
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/12613
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-12613
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-126132018-01-05T17:23:45Z Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure Garden, Jennifer Anna Study Design: Prospective test re-test study. Objectives: To examine the reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM) and discuss its clinical implications. Background: Review of the literature indicates the need for a client-centred wheelchair outcome measurement tool that measures participation outcomes related to wheelchair use. To date there have been no studies of the reliability and/or validity of the WhOM. Methods and Measures: A total of 50 participants who had a spinal cord injury participated in the study. There were three time periods in which the participant was required to answer questions. During the first session, demographic information was collected and the WhOM was completed along with the four additional measures. During the second session, the WhOM satisfaction scores were measured again. The entire WhOM was re-administered during the third by a second rater. A relative reliability index (intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC2,1 for test re-test and ICC2.2 for inter-rater reliability) was employed. Rater agreement for identified WhOM participation outcomes was determined using Kappa coefficients. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to examine construct validity. Results: Test re-test agreements were high (ICC2,1: 0.90) and inter-rater agreements were high (ICC2,2: 0.90). Substantial agreement between raters for identified participation outcomes was achieved (K≥ 0.71). The subscale of assistive device scale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) demonstrated a positive relationship with the WhOM (r ≥ 0.65). Items on the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) demonstrated a positive relationship with the WhOM (r ranged from 0.51 – 0.62). Both the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale and the Return to Normal Living Index failed to meet the hypothesis (r ≥ 0.50). Conclusion: The WhOM is a new and useful tool for clinicians and researchers who work in the field of wheelchair prescription and research. Test re-test and inter-rater agreements were high for individuals with a diagnosis of a spinal cord injury. Evidence of validity was demonstrated with the QUEST and items from the LIFE-H. Medicine, Faculty of Graduate 2009-08-31T15:19:50Z 2009-08-31T15:19:50Z 2009 2009-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/12613 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 3294990 bytes application/pdf University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Study Design: Prospective test re-test study. Objectives: To examine the reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM) and discuss its clinical implications. Background: Review of the literature indicates the need for a client-centred wheelchair outcome measurement tool that measures participation outcomes related to wheelchair use. To date there have been no studies of the reliability and/or validity of the WhOM. Methods and Measures: A total of 50 participants who had a spinal cord injury participated in the study. There were three time periods in which the participant was required to answer questions. During the first session, demographic information was collected and the WhOM was completed along with the four additional measures. During the second session, the WhOM satisfaction scores were measured again. The entire WhOM was re-administered during the third by a second rater. A relative reliability index (intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC2,1 for test re-test and ICC2.2 for inter-rater reliability) was employed. Rater agreement for identified WhOM participation outcomes was determined using Kappa coefficients. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to examine construct validity. Results: Test re-test agreements were high (ICC2,1: 0.90) and inter-rater agreements were high (ICC2,2: 0.90). Substantial agreement between raters for identified participation outcomes was achieved (K≥ 0.71). The subscale of assistive device scale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) demonstrated a positive relationship with the WhOM (r ≥ 0.65). Items on the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) demonstrated a positive relationship with the WhOM (r ranged from 0.51 – 0.62). Both the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale and the Return to Normal Living Index failed to meet the hypothesis (r ≥ 0.50). Conclusion: The WhOM is a new and useful tool for clinicians and researchers who work in the field of wheelchair prescription and research. Test re-test and inter-rater agreements were high for individuals with a diagnosis of a spinal cord injury. Evidence of validity was demonstrated with the QUEST and items from the LIFE-H. === Medicine, Faculty of === Graduate
author Garden, Jennifer Anna
spellingShingle Garden, Jennifer Anna
Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
author_facet Garden, Jennifer Anna
author_sort Garden, Jennifer Anna
title Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
title_short Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
title_full Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure
title_sort reliability and validity of the wheelchair outcome measure
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/12613
work_keys_str_mv AT gardenjenniferanna reliabilityandvalidityofthewheelchairoutcomemeasure
_version_ 1718582154315694080