| Summary: | The understanding of the interface between ecological and regulatory systems is necessary for
the evaluation of the effectiveness of current environmental management strategies and for the
design and implementation of new ones. The aim of this thesis is threefold. First, to compare
and contrast the US and the Canadian environmental enforcement systems as they manifest in
similar ecological systems, the Lower Fraser Basin - Puget Sound (LFB-PS) watersheds.
Secondarily, to assess the tangible and intangible costs and benefits that emerged as a result of
experiencing a water quality related enforcement action during the 1997-2000 time period for a
random sample of companies located in these watersheds. Thirdly, to examine the feedback and
learning effects that resulted from these incidents.
Through case analysis based on literature review and interviews with members of the regulatory
community the two enforcement systems are compared. Systematically collected primary data
via confidential interviews with companies provided for the quantitative and qualitative analysis
of the tangible and intangible costs, as well as for an assessment of and the nature and
effectiveness of existing feedback loops and learning processes.
The results have shown that even though the connection between ecosystem inputs and
enforcement inputs in the PS area have proven to be tighter and relatively more complex than in
the LFB, they did not seem to lead to an improved permitting process. Compliance rates are
generally higher in the PS indicating more effectiveness of that system on the input side.
In terms of charges and compliance effects, penalties were not higher in the PS area only when
measured by direct and indirect associated costs. Comparing the complexity of the two systems
has led to the discovery that the PS system has more components, levels, number of interactions,
available feedback mechanisms, and longer history. However, the actual number of adjustments
in the system that ultimately determine learning and change was lower since the meaningfulness
of the information exchanged and the frequency of the utilization of available feedback
mechanisms was less.
Overall, the PS system is better for ensuring organizational compliance with water quality
standards in the short term but not on the long term. For improving environmental performance,
the LFB system is more equipped and adaptable due to its smaller system size and its focus on
constructive feedback. === Science, Faculty of === Resources, Environment and Sustainability (IRES), Institute for === 1 Cd-rom === Graduate
|
|---|
