Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina

The incorporation of three conjugated polymers: MEH-PPV, DP-PPV and DP10- PPV into porous alumina films on Al, Si and ITO substrates via an adsorption process is reported. The nature of this adsorption process involves bonding between Lewis acidic Al centres on the alumina and the Lewis basic pol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kwong, Keri
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/11843
id ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-11843
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-118432018-01-05T17:36:04Z Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina Kwong, Keri The incorporation of three conjugated polymers: MEH-PPV, DP-PPV and DP10- PPV into porous alumina films on Al, Si and ITO substrates via an adsorption process is reported. The nature of this adsorption process involves bonding between Lewis acidic Al centres on the alumina and the Lewis basic polymer backbone. The MEH-PPV porous alumina hybrids was found to degrade rapidly upon the irradiation of UV-light (λext = 366 nm) in air but to a lesser extent in the dark and under nitrogen. Silanization of the pores by treatment with trimethylchlorosilane (TMS), phenyldimethylchlorosilane (PDMS) and octyldimethylchlorosilane (ODMS) resulted in lower MEH-PPV loading in porous alumina membranes (Anodisc 13) relative to the membranes with unmodified pore walls. In the fluorescence spectra, the intensity of the fluorescence from the Anodisc membranes containing MEH-PPV is higher than from MEH-PPV in silanized porous alumina. The Lewis acidic Al centres of the porous alumina in the silanized pores are screened from the Lewis basic polymer resulting in a lower fluorescence intensity. Within the silanes used, the absorbance intensity is in the order: TMS > ODMS, PDMS. Within the silanes, the difference in fluorescence intensities may be due to the size of the alkyl/aryl groups. The larger alkyl substituent in ODMS and the aryl group in PDMS may act to better screen the Lewis acidic Al than in the smaller alkyl group in TMS. In DP10-PPV, the unmodified porous alumina has a higher fluorescence intensity relative to the modified materials. This is attributed to the interactions between the pore walls and the polymer. The same screening effect that occurs for MEH-PPV is also observed for DP10-PPV. For DP10-PPV, the fluorescence intensities is in the order: PDMS > ODMS, TMS. This difference may arise from the favourable π-stacking interactions between the polymer and the PDMS silanized pores. Science, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Graduate 2009-08-06 2009-08-06 2001 2001-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/11843 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 8642453 bytes application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The incorporation of three conjugated polymers: MEH-PPV, DP-PPV and DP10- PPV into porous alumina films on Al, Si and ITO substrates via an adsorption process is reported. The nature of this adsorption process involves bonding between Lewis acidic Al centres on the alumina and the Lewis basic polymer backbone. The MEH-PPV porous alumina hybrids was found to degrade rapidly upon the irradiation of UV-light (λext = 366 nm) in air but to a lesser extent in the dark and under nitrogen. Silanization of the pores by treatment with trimethylchlorosilane (TMS), phenyldimethylchlorosilane (PDMS) and octyldimethylchlorosilane (ODMS) resulted in lower MEH-PPV loading in porous alumina membranes (Anodisc 13) relative to the membranes with unmodified pore walls. In the fluorescence spectra, the intensity of the fluorescence from the Anodisc membranes containing MEH-PPV is higher than from MEH-PPV in silanized porous alumina. The Lewis acidic Al centres of the porous alumina in the silanized pores are screened from the Lewis basic polymer resulting in a lower fluorescence intensity. Within the silanes used, the absorbance intensity is in the order: TMS > ODMS, PDMS. Within the silanes, the difference in fluorescence intensities may be due to the size of the alkyl/aryl groups. The larger alkyl substituent in ODMS and the aryl group in PDMS may act to better screen the Lewis acidic Al than in the smaller alkyl group in TMS. In DP10-PPV, the unmodified porous alumina has a higher fluorescence intensity relative to the modified materials. This is attributed to the interactions between the pore walls and the polymer. The same screening effect that occurs for MEH-PPV is also observed for DP10-PPV. For DP10-PPV, the fluorescence intensities is in the order: PDMS > ODMS, TMS. This difference may arise from the favourable π-stacking interactions between the polymer and the PDMS silanized pores. === Science, Faculty of === Chemistry, Department of === Graduate
author Kwong, Keri
spellingShingle Kwong, Keri
Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
author_facet Kwong, Keri
author_sort Kwong, Keri
title Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
title_short Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
title_full Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
title_fullStr Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
title_full_unstemmed Encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
title_sort encapsulation of luminescent polymers in porous alumina
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/11843
work_keys_str_mv AT kwongkeri encapsulationofluminescentpolymersinporousalumina
_version_ 1718588978373853184