Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia
Some level of human activity is often permitted in protected areas, and concerns arise over the impacts of these activities on the wildlife inhabiting them. Human impacts have traditionally been assessed under the paradigms of conservation biology and wildlife management, which tend to focus on p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/11823 |
id |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-11823 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UBC-oai-circle.library.ubc.ca-2429-118232018-01-05T17:36:07Z Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia Pitts, Anton Some level of human activity is often permitted in protected areas, and concerns arise over the impacts of these activities on the wildlife inhabiting them. Human impacts have traditionally been assessed under the paradigms of conservation biology and wildlife management, which tend to focus on population or community level processes. I argue that public concerns over the impacts of human activity, and especially of nonconsumptive recreation, also include a concern for the quality of life of individual animals, and that approaches from the field of animal welfare can address these concerns and thus complement the traditional approaches to the problem. I measured time budgets of grizzly bears at the Khutzeymateen/ K'tzim-a-deen Grizzly Bear Sanctuary to assess whether human presence appeared to negatively impact the bears. Neither feeding nor travelling behaviours changed significantly in the presence of tourists. Vigilance did increase significantly, but only by modest amounts. Two bears increased their resting by over 18%, leading to an overall significant effect. These changes indicate that tourist presence does not lead to severe .short-term impacts, and suggest that further restrictions are not necessary to protect the quality of life of the bears. Population parameters were not assessed in this study; a long-term monitoring plan would be necessary to rule out possible impacts at this scale. Land and Food Systems, Faculty of Graduate 2009-08-06 2009-08-06 2001 2001-11 Text Thesis/Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/11823 eng For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. 2756744 bytes application/pdf |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Some level of human activity is often permitted in protected areas, and concerns
arise over the impacts of these activities on the wildlife inhabiting them. Human impacts
have traditionally been assessed under the paradigms of conservation biology and
wildlife management, which tend to focus on population or community level processes. I
argue that public concerns over the impacts of human activity, and especially of nonconsumptive
recreation, also include a concern for the quality of life of individual
animals, and that approaches from the field of animal welfare can address these concerns
and thus complement the traditional approaches to the problem.
I measured time budgets of grizzly bears at the Khutzeymateen/ K'tzim-a-deen
Grizzly Bear Sanctuary to assess whether human presence appeared to negatively impact
the bears. Neither feeding nor travelling behaviours changed significantly in the presence
of tourists. Vigilance did increase significantly, but only by modest amounts. Two bears
increased their resting by over 18%, leading to an overall significant effect.
These changes indicate that tourist presence does not lead to severe .short-term
impacts, and suggest that further restrictions are not necessary to protect the quality of
life of the bears. Population parameters were not assessed in this study; a long-term
monitoring plan would be necessary to rule out possible impacts at this scale. === Land and Food Systems, Faculty of === Graduate |
author |
Pitts, Anton |
spellingShingle |
Pitts, Anton Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia |
author_facet |
Pitts, Anton |
author_sort |
Pitts, Anton |
title |
Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia |
title_short |
Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia |
title_full |
Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia |
title_fullStr |
Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in the Khutzeymateen (K’tzim-a-deen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary, British Columbia |
title_sort |
effects of wildlife viewing on the behaviour of grizzly bear (ursus arctos) in the khutzeymateen (k’tzim-a-deen) grizzly bear sanctuary, british columbia |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/11823 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pittsanton effectsofwildlifeviewingonthebehaviourofgrizzlybearursusarctosinthekhutzeymateenktzimadeengrizzlybearsanctuarybritishcolumbia |
_version_ |
1718588971445911552 |