| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北藝術大學 === 美術學系碩(博)士班 === 107 === Abstract
What kind of method should I adopt? I have contemplated for a long time on the problem of the discourse of my art creations through writing. Finally, I chose to sincerely find the most suitable way for me to express myself, adapting to the academic system is only a process of pursuing art. Concerning how my observation and thinking about the living environment affected my painting creations and expression, “dialogue” is directly related to my art creation. I divided my discourse into three stages to explore this problem; on the first stage, I wrote about how my living environments and emotions affected my two-stage painting creation through self-reports; on the second stage, I analyzed the direct dialogues concerning my artworks between me and the others, and also my previous artist statements, in order to explore how art creation, as a kind of language, can establish a dialogue relationship between people; on the third stage, I tried to move from the self-dialogues with the I in the past art creations, to artworks became a language and can be able to establish a relationship with the others, what is the significance of these relationships to my discussion? By directly facing the artworks and the dialogues with the others, in order to achieve continuous self-observation, from the exploration of artistic creations to the formation of dialogues with the artworks, from the inner-self to the external environments, and finally back to myself and the process of art creation in the future, is also an understanding to such thinking and analysis as an account to myself and the viewers.
|
|---|
