The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon

碩士 === 台灣神學研究學院 === 神學研究道學碩士班 === 107 === This thesis argues that “hospitality” is Paul’s exhortative approach in the Letter to Philemon. Hospitality was the custom of the time, but Paul, as the prisoner of Christ Jesus, transformed it into a persuasive tactic. In this tactic, Paul attempts to renew...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIN, GUAN-HONG, 林冠宏
Other Authors: GOH, MENG-HUN
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ypwrtt
id ndltd-TW-107TGST018B008
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107TGST018B0082019-11-21T05:33:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ypwrtt The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon 《腓利門書》中待客之道的勸說策略 LIN, GUAN-HONG 林冠宏 碩士 台灣神學研究學院 神學研究道學碩士班 107 This thesis argues that “hospitality” is Paul’s exhortative approach in the Letter to Philemon. Hospitality was the custom of the time, but Paul, as the prisoner of Christ Jesus, transformed it into a persuasive tactic. In this tactic, Paul attempts to renew Philemon’s view on Onesimus, which is a fixed, formulaic, and dominating view, that is, a perspective towards a slave. This kind of view also appears in biblical scholars’ interpretations of the social identity of Onesimus. While most biblical scholars admit that the view that “Onesimus is a slave” is without (inner) textual support, they still ground their interpretations based on this view. However, it is precisely through the tactic of hospitality that Paul challenges such a fixed view towards Onesimus, because hospitality is about receiving and welcoming foreigners, strangers, and the others. It is a risky lifestyle, and it is this adventurous character of hospitality that can transform Philemon’s view of Onesimus, making him receive Onesimus with a renewed perspective. Such a transformative effect of hospitality reminds readers not to interpret the Christian Bible and not to address conflicts with a fixed perspective. To highlight the (re)production of this fixed perspective, this thesis uses the notion of discourse in Edward W. Said’s Orientalism and semiotics to show why hospitality can be a practical tactic to renew one’s fixed perspective. In terms of interpretive process, this thesis does not impose the notion of “discourse” onto our textual analysis. Rather, the textual analysis foregrounds how the machine of “discourse” frames, polices, and justifies our (fixed) perspective. GOH, MENG-HUN 吳孟翰 2019 學位論文 ; thesis 94 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 台灣神學研究學院 === 神學研究道學碩士班 === 107 === This thesis argues that “hospitality” is Paul’s exhortative approach in the Letter to Philemon. Hospitality was the custom of the time, but Paul, as the prisoner of Christ Jesus, transformed it into a persuasive tactic. In this tactic, Paul attempts to renew Philemon’s view on Onesimus, which is a fixed, formulaic, and dominating view, that is, a perspective towards a slave. This kind of view also appears in biblical scholars’ interpretations of the social identity of Onesimus. While most biblical scholars admit that the view that “Onesimus is a slave” is without (inner) textual support, they still ground their interpretations based on this view. However, it is precisely through the tactic of hospitality that Paul challenges such a fixed view towards Onesimus, because hospitality is about receiving and welcoming foreigners, strangers, and the others. It is a risky lifestyle, and it is this adventurous character of hospitality that can transform Philemon’s view of Onesimus, making him receive Onesimus with a renewed perspective. Such a transformative effect of hospitality reminds readers not to interpret the Christian Bible and not to address conflicts with a fixed perspective. To highlight the (re)production of this fixed perspective, this thesis uses the notion of discourse in Edward W. Said’s Orientalism and semiotics to show why hospitality can be a practical tactic to renew one’s fixed perspective. In terms of interpretive process, this thesis does not impose the notion of “discourse” onto our textual analysis. Rather, the textual analysis foregrounds how the machine of “discourse” frames, polices, and justifies our (fixed) perspective.
author2 GOH, MENG-HUN
author_facet GOH, MENG-HUN
LIN, GUAN-HONG
林冠宏
author LIN, GUAN-HONG
林冠宏
spellingShingle LIN, GUAN-HONG
林冠宏
The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon
author_sort LIN, GUAN-HONG
title The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon
title_short The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon
title_full The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon
title_fullStr The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon
title_full_unstemmed The Persuasion Tactic of Hospitality in the Letter to Philemon
title_sort persuasion tactic of hospitality in the letter to philemon
publishDate 2019
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ypwrtt
work_keys_str_mv AT linguanhong thepersuasiontacticofhospitalityinthelettertophilemon
AT línguānhóng thepersuasiontacticofhospitalityinthelettertophilemon
AT linguanhong féilìménshūzhōngdàikèzhīdàodequànshuōcèlüè
AT línguānhóng féilìménshūzhōngdàikèzhīdàodequànshuōcèlüè
AT linguanhong persuasiontacticofhospitalityinthelettertophilemon
AT línguānhóng persuasiontacticofhospitalityinthelettertophilemon
_version_ 1719294303479529472