An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy

博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 環境工程學研究所 === 107 === Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has been implemented in many policies in the European Union since 2001. In Taiwan, SEA has been implemented for 28 cases since 2001, which includes various types of policies. National energy policy is the most challengin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yen-Yu Wu, 吳衍諭
Other Authors: 馬鴻文
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/tpb522
id ndltd-TW-107NTU05515052
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107NTU055150522019-11-21T05:34:26Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/tpb522 An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy 台灣政策環境影響評估制度分析:以台灣能源政策為例 Yen-Yu Wu 吳衍諭 博士 國立臺灣大學 環境工程學研究所 107 Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has been implemented in many policies in the European Union since 2001. In Taiwan, SEA has been implemented for 28 cases since 2001, which includes various types of policies. National energy policy is the most challenging type. There are three most important steps in SEA process: alternative planning, scoping, and impact assessment. However, the current limitation of method application affects the effectiveness of SEA. In this case, life cycle assessment (LCA) is integrated with SEA for clarifying the role of LCA in whole SEA process. The method of combining LCA and SEA has been developed and is applied in a case of Taiwan''s energy policy. Benefits from LCA in alternative planning, scoping, and impact assessment steps are explored. However, integrating SEA and policy planning processes is challenging owing to institutional challenges and/or political problems. We aimed to explore the challenges of this integration process through in-depth interviews with core stakeholders in Taiwan energy policy making. Our results reveal three main types of challenge related to policy planning, SEA implementation, and difficulties in dealing with environmental issues. The first includes the policy planning model, transparency in the policy planning process, and controversial issues clarification; the second includes the different types of SEA purposes, unclear feedback on policy planning, and public participation limitation; the third includes a lack of knowledge of brokerage processes, scientific uncertainty, the role of the Taiwan EPA (TEPA) for environmental thinking, and the influence of local information in policy planning. The results of this study can be applied to countries that use impact-oriented SEA (currently the most common type of SEA) and consider environmental issues during the energy policy planning process 馬鴻文 2019 學位論文 ; thesis 121 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 環境工程學研究所 === 107 === Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has been implemented in many policies in the European Union since 2001. In Taiwan, SEA has been implemented for 28 cases since 2001, which includes various types of policies. National energy policy is the most challenging type. There are three most important steps in SEA process: alternative planning, scoping, and impact assessment. However, the current limitation of method application affects the effectiveness of SEA. In this case, life cycle assessment (LCA) is integrated with SEA for clarifying the role of LCA in whole SEA process. The method of combining LCA and SEA has been developed and is applied in a case of Taiwan''s energy policy. Benefits from LCA in alternative planning, scoping, and impact assessment steps are explored. However, integrating SEA and policy planning processes is challenging owing to institutional challenges and/or political problems. We aimed to explore the challenges of this integration process through in-depth interviews with core stakeholders in Taiwan energy policy making. Our results reveal three main types of challenge related to policy planning, SEA implementation, and difficulties in dealing with environmental issues. The first includes the policy planning model, transparency in the policy planning process, and controversial issues clarification; the second includes the different types of SEA purposes, unclear feedback on policy planning, and public participation limitation; the third includes a lack of knowledge of brokerage processes, scientific uncertainty, the role of the Taiwan EPA (TEPA) for environmental thinking, and the influence of local information in policy planning. The results of this study can be applied to countries that use impact-oriented SEA (currently the most common type of SEA) and consider environmental issues during the energy policy planning process
author2 馬鴻文
author_facet 馬鴻文
Yen-Yu Wu
吳衍諭
author Yen-Yu Wu
吳衍諭
spellingShingle Yen-Yu Wu
吳衍諭
An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy
author_sort Yen-Yu Wu
title An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy
title_short An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy
title_full An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy
title_fullStr An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Taiwan Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Case Study of Taiwan Energy Policy
title_sort analysis of taiwan strategic environmental assessment: a case study of taiwan energy policy
publishDate 2019
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/tpb522
work_keys_str_mv AT yenyuwu ananalysisoftaiwanstrategicenvironmentalassessmentacasestudyoftaiwanenergypolicy
AT wúyǎnyù ananalysisoftaiwanstrategicenvironmentalassessmentacasestudyoftaiwanenergypolicy
AT yenyuwu táiwānzhèngcèhuánjìngyǐngxiǎngpínggūzhìdùfēnxīyǐtáiwānnéngyuánzhèngcèwèilì
AT wúyǎnyù táiwānzhèngcèhuánjìngyǐngxiǎngpínggūzhìdùfēnxīyǐtáiwānnéngyuánzhèngcèwèilì
AT yenyuwu analysisoftaiwanstrategicenvironmentalassessmentacasestudyoftaiwanenergypolicy
AT wúyǎnyù analysisoftaiwanstrategicenvironmentalassessmentacasestudyoftaiwanenergypolicy
_version_ 1719294568827977728