| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 都市計劃研究所 === 107 === In 2014, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe proposed the “ Place Revitalization Policy “, and the core goal is to activate the economy, create benefits, and achieve the sustainable development of the industry. In view of Japan's successful development experience, the term of “ Place Revitalization “ is quickly, extensively and enthusiastically discussed in Taiwan's political, policy, media and academic circles. At the same time, the central government also declared that 2019 as “ the first year of Taiwan's Place Revitalization ”, and the relevant ministry policies were in full swing, posing a new challenge to Taiwan's local development and the policy formation. In this situation, how is the process of shaping the “ Place Revitalization Policy “ in Taiwan affected by the policy mobility phenomenon? Also, what is the correlation between policy formation and the existing institutional context? What dilemmas does government policy attempt to challenge or solve?
Therefore, this study aims to explore the process of Taiwan’s “ Place Revitalization Policy “. Through qualitative research methods and taking the San-Xia of New Taipei City as a specific case study, exploring the impact of “ Place Revitalization Policy “. Under the phenomenon of policy mobility, the influence of “ Place Revitalization Policy “ trends on the development of Taiwan's local development and policy formation, as well as the roles and interactions of actors in the policy formation process. At the same time, the policy implications behind the policy are outlined, and follow-up development recommendations are proposed for existing policies.
Through field investigation and related second-hand data interaction analysis, this study has three research findings: First, the “ Place Revitalization Policy “ attempts to respond to the policy path dependence and institutional barriers accumulated during the community creation period. The government's policy input and policy guidance during the community creation period have led to the successful redevelopment of some localities. However, due to the limited resources of the policy resources, it not only promotes the emergence of the “writer ecology” but also the phenomenon of policy path dependence. Secondly, the “ Place Revitalization Policy “ seems to be a new policy path. In fact, the current institutional design still has the hidden concerns of policy path dependence, and even further strengthens the existing institutional barriers (such as writer ecology or specific groups...etc.) In addition, when creating new policy paths and new alliance targets, the links and coordination of existing local networks are relatively neglected. There are certain contradictions and conflicts between the new and old policy networks. Take the case of the San-Xia of New Taipei City as an example, it is difficult for people to integrate into the contradictions and conflicts between local communities...etc.
Therefore, this study proposes two policy implications: (1) In the process of implementing the policy, the government should avoid the possibility of “revolution of policy path dependence” or “enhance policy path dependence”; (2) with the rise of civic awareness, In the process of policy formation, we must strengthen social discussion and expand social participation more firmly, and we should adopt mutual cooperation mode, such as communication and coordination of new and old policy network resources.
|
|---|
