Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality

碩士 === 國立宜蘭大學 === 生物資源學院碩士在職專班 === 107 === USDA prime grade beef chuck eye roll derived from Holstein was dry aged with traditional method, dry aged in bags and wet aged in vacuum package for 7, 14 and 21 days respectively and then analyzed for physical, microbial and sensory differences. Higher agi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen-Yen Fu, 傅文燕
Other Authors: Rong-Shinn Lin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/snvp3u
id ndltd-TW-107NIU01404005
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107NIU014040052019-10-10T03:35:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/snvp3u Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality 熟成方式對牛肩胛眼肉捲品質的影響 Wen-Yen Fu 傅文燕 碩士 國立宜蘭大學 生物資源學院碩士在職專班 107 USDA prime grade beef chuck eye roll derived from Holstein was dry aged with traditional method, dry aged in bags and wet aged in vacuum package for 7, 14 and 21 days respectively and then analyzed for physical, microbial and sensory differences. Higher aging and trim losses were found in beef dry aged traditionally and aged in dry aging bags. Aged beef was more tender compared with frozen beef without aging (control). In regard of hardness of the beef, wet-aged beef was less hard than bag dry-aged beef, while the latter was less hard than traditionally dry-aged beef. Significant differences in total plate count and total fungi count were observed between each sample and the control (P<0.05). Total plate and fungi count of samples dry aged traditionally were all significantly lower than the control (P<0.05). There were no significant differences with respect to total plate and fungi count among beef aged in bag for 21, 14 and 7 days, but they were all significantly higher than beef aged traditionally and the control (P<0.05). Beef wet aged for 14 days had lower total plate count than wet aged for 21 days (P<0.05), but higher than wet aged for 7 days (P<0.05). Nevertheless, total plate and fungi count on samples of wet aged beef, regardless of days, were all significantly higher than the control (P<0.05), while those aged for 21 and 14 days have significant higher total plate and fungi count than all other samples (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in cooking loss, pH, and water activity. As for sensory preferences, regardless of aroma, tenderness, juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability, beef dry aged in bag for 14 days received the highest score among all the samples analyzed. Overall, beef palatability is improved through all three types of aging methods adopted in this study. Rong-Shinn Lin 林榮信 2019 學位論文 ; thesis 48 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立宜蘭大學 === 生物資源學院碩士在職專班 === 107 === USDA prime grade beef chuck eye roll derived from Holstein was dry aged with traditional method, dry aged in bags and wet aged in vacuum package for 7, 14 and 21 days respectively and then analyzed for physical, microbial and sensory differences. Higher aging and trim losses were found in beef dry aged traditionally and aged in dry aging bags. Aged beef was more tender compared with frozen beef without aging (control). In regard of hardness of the beef, wet-aged beef was less hard than bag dry-aged beef, while the latter was less hard than traditionally dry-aged beef. Significant differences in total plate count and total fungi count were observed between each sample and the control (P<0.05). Total plate and fungi count of samples dry aged traditionally were all significantly lower than the control (P<0.05). There were no significant differences with respect to total plate and fungi count among beef aged in bag for 21, 14 and 7 days, but they were all significantly higher than beef aged traditionally and the control (P<0.05). Beef wet aged for 14 days had lower total plate count than wet aged for 21 days (P<0.05), but higher than wet aged for 7 days (P<0.05). Nevertheless, total plate and fungi count on samples of wet aged beef, regardless of days, were all significantly higher than the control (P<0.05), while those aged for 21 and 14 days have significant higher total plate and fungi count than all other samples (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in cooking loss, pH, and water activity. As for sensory preferences, regardless of aroma, tenderness, juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability, beef dry aged in bag for 14 days received the highest score among all the samples analyzed. Overall, beef palatability is improved through all three types of aging methods adopted in this study.
author2 Rong-Shinn Lin
author_facet Rong-Shinn Lin
Wen-Yen Fu
傅文燕
author Wen-Yen Fu
傅文燕
spellingShingle Wen-Yen Fu
傅文燕
Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
author_sort Wen-Yen Fu
title Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
title_short Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
title_full Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
title_fullStr Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
title_sort effects of different aging process on beef chuck eye roll quality
publishDate 2019
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/snvp3u
work_keys_str_mv AT wenyenfu effectsofdifferentagingprocessonbeefchuckeyerollquality
AT fùwényàn effectsofdifferentagingprocessonbeefchuckeyerollquality
AT wenyenfu shúchéngfāngshìduìniújiānjiǎyǎnròujuǎnpǐnzhìdeyǐngxiǎng
AT fùwényàn shúchéngfāngshìduìniújiānjiǎyǎnròujuǎnpǐnzhìdeyǐngxiǎng
_version_ 1719263504671703040