Compliance with Tobacco Hazards Prevention Policy in Taiwan, 2016-2018.

• Main Authors: LIAO, CHIH-YING, 廖芷瑩
• Other Authors: KAO, SENYEONG
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2019
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/yk8uct

碩士 === 國防醫學院 === 公共衛生學研究所 === 107 === Background: The main purpose of this study was to observe the compliance for the types of selling tobacco public place, and influencing factors of selling tobacco products to person under the age of eighteen. Methods: Data was collected from Consumers' Foundation, Chinese Taipei (CFCT) 2016-2018 audit survey from 22 cities. This study analyzed the compliance with the places for selling tobacco products (Article 10 and 13), and smoking is completely prohibited in the places (Article15 and 16). Use the SPSS chi-square test to analyze the relevant factors for compliance with the places for selling tobacco products, smoking is completely prohibited in the following places (Articles 10, 15 and 16), the generalized linear model was used to analyze the influencing factors of no person shall provide tobacco products to person under the age of eighteen (Article 13). Results: In different types of tobacco-smelling places (Article 10), the same smoking product display does not exceed the minimum unit sold (98.7%, p < 0.001) and the total area of tobacco products displayed in the same tobacco-selling place. The compliance of the meter (p=0.015) is statistically significant, with the betel nut booth and the general store being less compliant. In prohibiting the sale of tobacco products to person under age of eighteen (Article 13), whether the city group , clerk asks about the age were the impact factor of compliance; in all types of completely banned places (Article 15), There is statistically significant difference in compliance with smoking-free utensils and no smoking in non-smoking areas, and compliance with leisure and entertainment venues is low (93%, 90.7%), medical and social welfare units site compliance is 100%. In all types of smoking is prohibited except in the designated smoking areas (Article 16), the park green space has no smoking signs at all entrances and no one was smoking in non-smoking places. The situation was worse than other types (95.1%) (92.1%), the compliance of non-supply-related utensils in colleges and universities was lower than that of other places (85.7%), but there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: The sale of tobacco products (Article 10) and no person shall provide tobacco peoducts to person under age of eighteen (Article 13) were the worst cases of betel stalls. It is recommended to strengthen communication with various tobacco products and to promote publicity and education. Training courses to increase the understanding of the smoking retailers' policies, and increase the number of visits to the betel stalls where the sales of tobacco products are less subject to minor compliance, in order to improve the health education propaganda and inspection situation in each county. All types of places are completely non-smoking and may not be supplied with smoking-related utensils (Article 15). All places at leisure and entertainment venues are marked with no smoking, and whether smoking-related utensils are supplied in the no-smoking area. Lower, it is recommended to replace the non-smoking signs that are vague or old and unrecognizable, and to strengthen the regulations to stop the supply of smoking-related utensils. The overall compliance of all types of places except smoking areas (Article 16) is the lowest in compliance with park green space. It is recommended that smokers be advised immediately when they smoke in non-smoking areas, except for obvious settings. In addition to the no-smoking sign, you can also draw a no-smoking symbol or draw a smoking area on the ground where smokers are often found to distinguish between no-smoking areas and smoking areas.