Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 中國文學系 === 107 === The Chunqiu (春秋) has three commentaries which are Zuozhuan (左傳), Gongyang (公羊) and Guliang (穀梁). They are documentation of humanities actives of Chunqiu period such as the King-Minister regime, the inheritance system and the behavior principle. They are the repres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LAU-YI WAI SAMANTHA, 劉懿慧
Other Authors: Te Ming-Liu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/kpf8up
id ndltd-TW-107NCU05045014
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107NCU050450142019-10-22T05:28:12Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/kpf8up Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu 《春秋》三傳稱賢事例探析 LAU-YI WAI SAMANTHA 劉懿慧 碩士 國立中央大學 中國文學系 107 The Chunqiu (春秋) has three commentaries which are Zuozhuan (左傳), Gongyang (公羊) and Guliang (穀梁). They are documentation of humanities actives of Chunqiu period such as the King-Minister regime, the inheritance system and the behavior principle. They are the representatives of the pre-Qin studies especially on the process of political reform during Chunqiu period, which form feudal system to monarchy. “Xian”(賢)one of the comments that commonly used in praising a person with both talents and high moral character in these three commentaries. This research aims to investigate how Zuozhuan, Gongyang and Guliang define and interpret Xian. It will begin with detailed study on different textual records of Xian. After that, the assessments of Xian will be comparing the interpretations between these three commentaries. in order to reflect their attitudes towards Xian under the same or different cases. The result findings showed that the concept of Xian was nearly standardized in Chunqiu period and it is strongly linked with King-Minister regime. Xian is normally used in illustrating one’s admiration of the emperors or ministers who had adequate abilities and practiced high moral standards when they ruled the fiefdom.is widely used in reviewing a person, mostly on nobles and officials who remained at relatively higher social status than plebeians. The result indicates that nobles and officials who had outstanding political ability would be remarked as Xian. Moreover, the result also showed that “Xian” was not only a comment to people, but also a judgment on a decision. This finding defies the conventional conception of “Xian”. Other than comments of a person, Xian could be used to comment personality and also issues. Key words: The Chunqiu, Xian, Zhozhuan , Gongyang, Guliang Te Ming-Liu 劉德明 2019 學位論文 ; thesis 151 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 中國文學系 === 107 === The Chunqiu (春秋) has three commentaries which are Zuozhuan (左傳), Gongyang (公羊) and Guliang (穀梁). They are documentation of humanities actives of Chunqiu period such as the King-Minister regime, the inheritance system and the behavior principle. They are the representatives of the pre-Qin studies especially on the process of political reform during Chunqiu period, which form feudal system to monarchy. “Xian”(賢)one of the comments that commonly used in praising a person with both talents and high moral character in these three commentaries. This research aims to investigate how Zuozhuan, Gongyang and Guliang define and interpret Xian. It will begin with detailed study on different textual records of Xian. After that, the assessments of Xian will be comparing the interpretations between these three commentaries. in order to reflect their attitudes towards Xian under the same or different cases. The result findings showed that the concept of Xian was nearly standardized in Chunqiu period and it is strongly linked with King-Minister regime. Xian is normally used in illustrating one’s admiration of the emperors or ministers who had adequate abilities and practiced high moral standards when they ruled the fiefdom.is widely used in reviewing a person, mostly on nobles and officials who remained at relatively higher social status than plebeians. The result indicates that nobles and officials who had outstanding political ability would be remarked as Xian. Moreover, the result also showed that “Xian” was not only a comment to people, but also a judgment on a decision. This finding defies the conventional conception of “Xian”. Other than comments of a person, Xian could be used to comment personality and also issues. Key words: The Chunqiu, Xian, Zhozhuan , Gongyang, Guliang
author2 Te Ming-Liu
author_facet Te Ming-Liu
LAU-YI WAI SAMANTHA
劉懿慧
author LAU-YI WAI SAMANTHA
劉懿慧
spellingShingle LAU-YI WAI SAMANTHA
劉懿慧
Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu
author_sort LAU-YI WAI SAMANTHA
title Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu
title_short Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu
title_full Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu
title_fullStr Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu
title_full_unstemmed Cases study of Xian in three commentaries of Chunqiu
title_sort cases study of xian in three commentaries of chunqiu
publishDate 2019
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/kpf8up
work_keys_str_mv AT lauyiwaisamantha casesstudyofxianinthreecommentariesofchunqiu
AT liúyìhuì casesstudyofxianinthreecommentariesofchunqiu
AT lauyiwaisamantha chūnqiūsānchuánchēngxiánshìlìtànxī
AT liúyìhuì chūnqiūsānchuánchēngxiánshìlìtànxī
_version_ 1719273717204254720