The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog

博士 === 國立中央大學 === 中國文學系 === 107 === “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” were four common Chinese southern drama acts. Unfortunately, the original screenplays as well as the scripts from Yuan dynasty were long lost, and it was not until the Ming Dynasty when critics and analysts became interested in these four ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu, Huai-Zhi, 許懷之
Other Authors: Sun, Mei
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/qw2545
id ndltd-TW-107NCU05045007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-107NCU050450072019-06-27T05:42:35Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/qw2545 The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog 《荊釵記》、《白兔記》、《拜月亭》、《殺狗記》接受研究 Xu, Huai-Zhi 許懷之 博士 國立中央大學 中國文學系 107 “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” were four common Chinese southern drama acts. Unfortunately, the original screenplays as well as the scripts from Yuan dynasty were long lost, and it was not until the Ming Dynasty when critics and analysts became interested in these four acts. Revisions were made to these four acts during the Ming Dynasty, including the plot, wording, and music; these revisions marked as major developmental milestones and, along with rising popularity, these four Chinese southern drama acts were bundled together as one. However, the bundling did not mean the advancement of these four drama acts into the masterpiece category. Towards the end of Ming Dynasty, the revised “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” became known as the “four excellent work.” This honorary acknowledgment stemmed from the historical/ancient nature of the four drama acts that coincided with some musicians’ “natural color theory” and “music theory,” evolving the four drama acts into teaching materials, guidelines, and comparisons for music at the time. In fact, Jiang Xiao’s “Old NanJiugong Pu” was first known as the “Nanqu Quanpu;” although this piece did include “Notes of Lute” and “Jing, Liu, Pay, King,” it did not advance the popularity of these southern drama acts by much. It was not until the “Supplement NanJiugong Pu” compiled by Wujiang Group’s leader Sink Jing that the horizon of expectations in music of “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” started rising systematically. During the Shunzhi period of the Qing Dynasty, the two Nanqu Quanpu “New Nanqu Pu” and “Nanqu Jiugong” made it possible for “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” to follow the tradition, but also impacting pop culture at the time, giving these four drama acts more perspectives and thus influencing different groups as well as generations of individuals. In terms of the on stage performance, from the Qing Dynasty to the 20th century, “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” were not commonly performed. In fact, the “Tale of Killing a Dog” almost disappeared. However, during the 20th century, within the Chinese literature world, discussions and interpretations of “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” solidified these four drama acts’ actual value and historical roles. And now, “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” has become the “Four Nancy” and “No.1 of Drama,” a natural process in securing their classic roles within the Chinese literature world. Sun, Mei 孫玫 2019 學位論文 ; thesis 198 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立中央大學 === 中國文學系 === 107 === “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” were four common Chinese southern drama acts. Unfortunately, the original screenplays as well as the scripts from Yuan dynasty were long lost, and it was not until the Ming Dynasty when critics and analysts became interested in these four acts. Revisions were made to these four acts during the Ming Dynasty, including the plot, wording, and music; these revisions marked as major developmental milestones and, along with rising popularity, these four Chinese southern drama acts were bundled together as one. However, the bundling did not mean the advancement of these four drama acts into the masterpiece category. Towards the end of Ming Dynasty, the revised “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” became known as the “four excellent work.” This honorary acknowledgment stemmed from the historical/ancient nature of the four drama acts that coincided with some musicians’ “natural color theory” and “music theory,” evolving the four drama acts into teaching materials, guidelines, and comparisons for music at the time. In fact, Jiang Xiao’s “Old NanJiugong Pu” was first known as the “Nanqu Quanpu;” although this piece did include “Notes of Lute” and “Jing, Liu, Pay, King,” it did not advance the popularity of these southern drama acts by much. It was not until the “Supplement NanJiugong Pu” compiled by Wujiang Group’s leader Sink Jing that the horizon of expectations in music of “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” started rising systematically. During the Shunzhi period of the Qing Dynasty, the two Nanqu Quanpu “New Nanqu Pu” and “Nanqu Jiugong” made it possible for “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” to follow the tradition, but also impacting pop culture at the time, giving these four drama acts more perspectives and thus influencing different groups as well as generations of individuals. In terms of the on stage performance, from the Qing Dynasty to the 20th century, “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” were not commonly performed. In fact, the “Tale of Killing a Dog” almost disappeared. However, during the 20th century, within the Chinese literature world, discussions and interpretations of “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” solidified these four drama acts’ actual value and historical roles. And now, “Jing, Liu, Pay, King” has become the “Four Nancy” and “No.1 of Drama,” a natural process in securing their classic roles within the Chinese literature world.
author2 Sun, Mei
author_facet Sun, Mei
Xu, Huai-Zhi
許懷之
author Xu, Huai-Zhi
許懷之
spellingShingle Xu, Huai-Zhi
許懷之
The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog
author_sort Xu, Huai-Zhi
title The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog
title_short The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog
title_full The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog
title_fullStr The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog
title_full_unstemmed The History of Literary Reception in Hairpin、Notes of White Rabbit、Praying to the Moon、The Tale of Killing a Dog
title_sort history of literary reception in hairpin、notes of white rabbit、praying to the moon、the tale of killing a dog
publishDate 2019
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/qw2545
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhuaizhi thehistoryofliteraryreceptioninhairpinnotesofwhiterabbitprayingtothemoonthetaleofkillingadog
AT xǔhuáizhī thehistoryofliteraryreceptioninhairpinnotesofwhiterabbitprayingtothemoonthetaleofkillingadog
AT xuhuaizhi jīngchāijìbáitùjìbàiyuètíngshāgǒujìjiēshòuyánjiū
AT xǔhuáizhī jīngchāijìbáitùjìbàiyuètíngshāgǒujìjiēshòuyánjiū
AT xuhuaizhi historyofliteraryreceptioninhairpinnotesofwhiterabbitprayingtothemoonthetaleofkillingadog
AT xǔhuáizhī historyofliteraryreceptioninhairpinnotesofwhiterabbitprayingtothemoonthetaleofkillingadog
_version_ 1719213047705239552