| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 兩岸高階主管經營管理境外碩士在職學位學程 === 107 === The main purpose of this study is to explore the influence of ideology on curriculum design and textbook review at this stage of the country. "Citizens are the easiest to express ideological concepts in all subjects, and it is particularly easy to have a position." "Every regime will express its own ideology in this way. The easiest thing to teach is through social science textbooks." In the continent where ideological education is firmly grasped, history textbooks are completely controlled by the central government.
In particular, I may or may be the first line of the future education field. This study attempts to make an objective comparative analysis of the three versions of the textbooks submitted by the current national middle school textbooks, and proposes to provide the government with reference in the textbook review. Finally, this study proposes the conclusion that ideology cannot disappear or disappear in any era. Of course, the entire political atmosphere should have more influence than textbooks.
For example, the phenomenon of " Han Wave" in the 2018 9-in-1 election, as well as the phenomenon of "Same-sex marriage ", "anti-nuclear", "cultural sexism" and "feminism", all appear at different levels in different forms. The ideology dispute of the citizenship program is even more familiar. Nowadays, it is necessary to promote the basic state religion in the past 12 years. It is to cultivate the basic abilities of modern citizens. Education should be more professional and neutral. It should be avoided as much as possible. In the battle of form, we look at how communist countries such as North Korea and the People’s Republic of China put communist ideology into textbooks because education is a century-old undertaking.
For example, in 2012, Hong Kong people’s anti-state religion, that is, anti-political brainwashing, 2018 new strong people anti-political brainwashing, civic textbooks in the 21st century today, can no longer be reduced to serve the government tools, how to think about scholars in the future The "thought" revealed in the class on the podium becomes "ideology" (strong resistance), and then the internalization into "mystery" (lower resistance of the average person) seems to find a way out for the ideology.
|
|---|
