| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 公共行政與政策學系 === 107 === This thesis reflects the power balance in organizing the political dialogues while implementing negotiations within a peacebuilding process in Myanmar. From several decades ago, the Myanmar government, military leaders and ethnic leaders could not find out for a ceasefire condition and no favor was given to end the civil war. By the coming of civilian government in 2010, they began establishing a ceasefire agreement and political framework. The political dialogues were launched by the stakeholders including government, military officers, members of parliaments, ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and political parties. Although some compromises are seen as achievements, huge deadlocks and dilemmas remain as unsolved problems. This paper is not going to figure out how to overcome the problems but highlighting how these problems are occurred in these conditions based on the voices of the participants and the articles described in the mass media. According to the history of Myanmar modern politics, the military has taken a prominent leading role since from the coup from 1962 to 2010. Myanmar military is taking part in many sectors of administration. Even beyond 2010, the military supposed that they still have to participate in the politics of Myanmar because the country's condition is unstable yet. The military role of inclusion in the peace process is larger than other participants’ roles. EAOs are feeling that they are confronting with two governments and it is hard to get the resolution for the conflicts. Under the civilian-military relations, the way how the government, military, and ethnic groups take part in political dialogues is going to be described in this paper. From those details, the problems and the reasons why these have been popped up would be discussed and analyzed.
|
|---|
