Jordan and Boonin on Same-Sex Marriage Argument
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 哲學系 === 107 === Jeff Jordan has put forward soundest argument ever that is against same-sex marriage. He assumes that same-sex marriage as a public dilemma which needs to be solved by two resolutions: resolution by declaration or resolution by accommodation. However, Jordan acclaim...
Main Authors: | Wang, Bing-Yu, 王禀寓 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | 鄭光明 |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2019
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/u6xqhs |
Similar Items
-
David Boonin on the Non-Identity Argument: Rejecting the Second Premise
by: Molly Gardner
Published: (2020-02-01) -
How Rule Consequentialism Avoids Boonin’s Implausible Conclusion
by: Tim Mulgan
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Same sex marriage and the perceived assault on opposite sex marriage.
by: Alexis Dinno, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
On The Constitutional protection of The Marriage-Focusing on Same-Sex Marriage
by: Chia-Yi Lin, et al.
Published: (2012) -
The constitutional right of same-sex marriage
by: 楊詠誼