The Relationships between Attractiveness, Leisure Constraints, Recreation Experience, Distance, and Behavioral Intentions: The Case of Taichung City Public Bicycle Riders

• Main Authors: LIAO,FEN-LAN, 廖芬蘭
• Other Authors: LIN,CHUNG-HSIEN
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2018
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9hg4ma

碩士 === 逢甲大學 === 景觀與遊憩碩士學位學程 === 107 === His study wants to further discuss the public bicycle rental locations and stations also the surrounding environment resources, which can increase the opportunities of the residents' leisure. Furthermore have positive effects on improving the leisure ob-stacles of residents. When residents use public bicycles for recreational activities or the recreation planning is also the same. Passengers choose scenic spots with sightseeing attractions to carry out recreational activities. Residents and passengers will experience throughout the trip and leisure activities. About the experience and mentally satisfaction of the whole journey, if there has any connection between behavioral purpose and after journey? I would like to discuss it forward. Refer to the relevant literature on past sightseeing attractions, leisure obstacles, recreation experience and behavioral purposes.. For residents and passengers who rent public bicycles, in Civic Square, Qiuhong Valley, Taichung Railway Station and Fengjia University The rental station conducted a questionnaire survey and obtained 349 valid questionnaires. According to the analysis results, most of the respondents were single men under the age of 30, and the overall distribution was mostly econom-ically independent students and young people whose economic foundation was not stable. Most of them lived in school’s neighborhood. Residents (within the scope of public bicycle rental stations), the itinerary is mostly one-day round-trip, and after taking public transportation or walking to the public bicycle rental station, rent bicy-cles to the tourist attractions mode, mostly alone or 2 people. The results of this analysis are divided into four aspects: "Arts and Activities", "Religious Historical Features", "Facilities Services" and "Natural Landscapes"; leisure obstacles are "social motivation" and "time economy" The three aspects of the "Resources" and "Adaptation and Decision" are the four aspects of "Interpersonal Learning", "Environmental Perception", "Relaxation" and "Management Services". Through independent sample T verification and single factor analysis of variance, we explore whether there are differences in the sociological background and recreational characteristics of the interviewers, leisure obstacles, recreation experience and behavioral purposes. If there are differences, One stop further Scheff The 'e method performs multiple comparisons. The results of the analysis show that there is a significant difference between the gender and the number of “religious historical features” of tourism attraction; in the leisure barrier, gender has significant differences in “adaptation and decision making” and the number of peers in “social motivation”; In the experience of the recreation experience, there is a significant difference in the number on "interpersonal interaction learning." The further discussion within time limited or cost conditions of the distance ef-fect. The results of the research data show that for the residents of the public bicycle rental system, mainly because of the proximity to the home location, leisure can spend time or accompany others go shopping and enjoy great food and snacks, leisure travel distances are in the mentally distance zone; outside of the public bicycle rental system range residents are mostly have obvious motivational goals (shopping ) and mentally factors (spending time with accompany), distance zone The effect is between the mentally distance and the mixed distance zone; the passenger's motives are in line with Driver and Brown's (1975) passengers' activities as "target-oriented", for enjoying great food, shopping, and sightseeing, historical relics, Landscape, the distance zone effect is between the mixed distance and the substantial distance zone. Finally, the regression analysis is used to verify the research hypothesis. The results show , The attraction has a significant negative impact on leisure obstacles. The attraction has a positive significant impact on the recreation experience. The leisure obstacle has a positive significant impact on the recreation experience. There is a positive significant impact on behavioral purposes.